Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+vertical\s+advice\s+needed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+vertical\s+advice\s+needed\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 vertical advice needed (score: 1): Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:35:32 -0700; Gentlemen and ladies, I (finally) plan to upgrade my topband transmit antenna from a very poor (read low) inverted V, to a vertical. Actually, I plan to do this at at least two of the three stations; /archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00003.html (8,904 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160 vertical advice needed (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 16:49:08 -0700; Dan essentially wastes the 14 ft of stinger above them. You would do better if you could run the top loading wires from the top of the stinger. Then you get into the question of how much down tilt of; /archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00007.html (8,222 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160 vertical advice needed (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 16:56:33 -0700; At 10:35 AM 2004-06-05, Dan Levin wrote: Here is what I know. 1) I will build a 74' vertical out of ~46' of Rohn pushup mast topped with ~28' of aluminum stinger. 2) Add three our four top hat wires; /archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00008.html (8,014 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 160 vertical advice needed (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:26:06 -0400; vs. elevated "excellent", conductivity Unless you are over saltwater or a salt marsh, it makes little difference what your soil is. 30 ms/m isn't that much different than 3. The difference primarily; /archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00009.html (8,567 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]