Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Condx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Condx\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M Condx (score: 1): Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 09:43:36 EST; Guess I know what it's like to operate this contest in summer! The S9 snow static was almost unnoticeable because of the S9 +20 static crashes. My apologies for not copying well and thanks to all who; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00048.html (6,865 bytes)
2. Topband: 160m condx (score: 1): Author: la6wea@online.no (La6wea); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 19:35:50 -0000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0019_01BF4CB3.C0FB12C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Condx was good to state; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00266.html (7,033 bytes)
3. Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: zante@otenet.gr ( SV8CS Spiros Chimarios); Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 09:34:38 +0200; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00E5_01BF37F1.751ACD40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Very nice condx last ni; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00187.html (7,121 bytes)
4. Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: n6ff@snowcrest.net (Dick Wolf); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 11:11:59 -0800; Hi Gang, A61AJ appeared at my QTH at 1440Z from the SW, only peaked to a 559 today, and disappeared about 1513Z. He was being heard by quite a few, if the pileup was any indication. Glad to see a few; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00203.html (7,290 bytes)
5. Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 22:26:25 -0800; Woe is me! After working 10-watter 9V1PC for a new one at 1435Z and the sun about to peek over the horizon, a quick tune-around showed no other activity so I QRTed! When I read N6FF's message about A; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00209.html (6,816 bytes)
6. TopBand: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: jrh@lemoorenet.com (JRH); Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 07:40:05 -0800; This morning from about 1300-1430z the zero's and seven's were giving T88II good signal reports so I sat patiently (well, almost) waiting for the prop to pick up. K6ZZ, 120 miles SE of me heard and w; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00101.html (7,028 bytes)
7. TopBand: 160m condx (score: 1): Author: vk3ajj@techno.net.au (vk3ajj); Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 07:12:49 +1000; Dear Reflectees Nice southern hemisphere condx today on topband: zs5k 2051 569 sig s5lb 2100 559 sig Will be on 1.832 from 2040z over the next few mornings 73 Paul (vk3ajj) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00102.html (6,513 bytes)
8. TopBand: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: olufsen@hnett.no (La6wea); Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 21:47:21 +0100; I have read the mail about the condx this afternoon around 1400-1500z and you all must take the time to listen more for Scandinavia at around our sunset. I could hear a couple of westcoast stations a; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00073.html (6,984 bytes)
9. TopBand: 160m condx (score: 1): Author: olufsen@hnett.no (La6wea); Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 16:05:40 +0100; It was a great opning to most of the US on ssb this morning but very low activty specially from the west coast. I worked a couple of stations from w6 w7 and w0 along with a lot of east cost. The sign; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00484.html (6,749 bytes)
10. Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:24:01 +0000 (UTC); Band still down a bit from last week but 4k6fo good sigs now on 1830.0 from Alim. 73 JEFF _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00043.html (6,414 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:27:17 -0600; I wish we could get the word out to avoid frequencies like that: 1810, 1820, 1830, etc. There are almost always AM BC harmonics on those freqs. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Arc; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00045.html (7,465 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:31:16 +0100; Hi Is there a listing of such frequencies? Want to avoid those in the coming contests 73's Filipe CT1ILT CR5E CR6K Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00046.html (7,948 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:37:06 +0000 (UTC); Aren't US and Canadian broadcast stations on frequencies that are divisible by 10, like 900, 910, 920 kHz? That would place harmonics on 1800, 1820, 1840, etc. I think I read somewhere before that Eu; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00048.html (8,381 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:04:03 +0100; Thanks to everyone who answered, basically I will be avoiding all /10 and /9 frequencies. 73's Filipe Lopes CT1ILT - CR6K F4VPX - TM3M _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00049.html (10,398 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: k8gg@voyager.net; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:00:58 -0500 (EST); Filipe: In the USA and Canada: 1810, 1820, 1830, 1840, 1850, 1860, 1870, 1880, 1890, and every 10 KHz through 2000 KHz. I missed some Eastern Europeans because they TX on 1870 in CQWW CW Contest and; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00050.html (9,688 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:13:27 -0800; A related issue is that frequencies ending in 0 and 5 tend to attract casual operators who can't hear DX. Many times I have heard them start up and call CQ on top of DX. I like to choose a frequency; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00051.html (11,056 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:13:38 -0700; Know bad frequencies- great resource here: http://www.k8nd.com/TopbandBadFreqs.pdf <http://www.k8nd.com/TopbandBadFreqs.pdf> Howevera best practice on 160m is NEVER call CQ on an exact frequency. Why; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00052.html (10,306 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:26:54 -0600; Perfect! Thanks for sharing. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00053.html (10,555 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: Mario Raul Andraca Rivera <marioandraca@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:53:54 +0000; Also on SA,frequency 1810/20/30/40/50/60/70/80/90/00 and more,have QRM AM broadcasting. 73 Mario LU8DPM Enviado desde mi Movistar HUAWEI ALE-L23 -- Mensaje original -- Asunto: Re: Topband: 160m Condx; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00054.html (10,323 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1): Author: "Lee. KX4TT via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:57:42 -0500; Concur ..... if a frequency either ends with a zero, or if you add the digits up and get a number divisible by 9, it will likely have a greater change for BC interference. Example in Tampa (Florida,; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00055.html (12,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]