Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Condx\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Stein-Roar Brobakken <post@lb3re.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:12:15 +0100
Hello Check my website, i got this from a guy few years ago!! http://www.lb3re.com/ham-tech/160m_good_QRGs.JPG Best Regards, Stein-Roar Brobakken post@lb3re.com LB3RE K3RAG Ex LA6FJA Skype: lb3re.rag
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00056.html (10,068 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:55:44 +0000
Just as a reminder to all that these BCI problems can also occur at 2nd and 3rd order IMD mixing. Example 3rd order, one station on 1220 where 2X equals 2440 and a second station at 620 subtracted pu
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00057.html (13,818 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:19:49 -0600
This only started with plastic radios and digital displays and got worse with dial resolution down to one cycle. Back when everyone had VFOs like the HA-5 with dial markers only every 50 kc no one e
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00074.html (8,046 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 02:54:57 +0200
Thanks, How about JA? 1810-1824.9 Where is better not CQ? Sam LY5W Just back home from W6 2018-11-12, pr 20:27 Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com ra: _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.co
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00082.html (11,860 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Petr Ourednik <indians@xsmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:55:20 +0100
Hi, an old article here: https://160mband.blogspot.com/2018/02/the-forbidden-dx-frequencies-table-on.html 73 - Petr, OK1RP -- 73 - Petr, OK1RP -- B: http://goo.gl/Fd2JhJ G+: http://goo.gl/w3u2s9 G+:
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00083.html (13,141 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Paul Mclaren <paul.mcl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:54:16 +0000
I hadn't seen it mentioned but here in NW EU the continuous dashes from Fish Net beacons can be a pain at times. Regards Paul MM0ZBH _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00084.html (14,253 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Carl Jonsson <carl.jonsson7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:00:12 +0100
In Scandinavia freq´s above 1824 are the best. No fishnet beacons there. Carl _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00085.html (15,937 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Petr Ourednik <indians@xsmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:21:22 +0100
Hi, the article about fishnet is here (including the beacon/drift nets): https://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/drift-nets-fishing-beacons.html https://160mband.blogspot.com/2015/07/160m-band-beacons-
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00086.html (16,144 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: 160m Condx (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:08:33 -0500
Regarding 10 kHz harmonics from BCB stations... last year I was using my HQ-140 receiver for casual SW and ham monitoring at my computer desk. With a full size 160 meter the Hammarlund overloaded to
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00157.html (8,229 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu