Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Transcievers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Transcievers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M Transcievers (score: 1): Author: "Michael Kincaid" <w7fkf@fast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 07:22:37 -0500; Dennis - I went from an ICOM 735 to a Ten Tec OMNI VI+ because I had read it was the best RX on the planet. That was over 10 years ago. It certainly did work for me and I heard DX stations not visibl; /archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00009.html (6,828 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160M Transcievers (score: 1): Author: "Petr Ourednik" <indians@xsmail.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:53:19 +0200; Hi, no Michael > the best RX on the planet is TT Omni V ! Well seriously I had an opportunity to use an Icom 735 for cple of months. When I compared to the receiving capability of the TT Omni V.9 whi; /archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00012.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160M Transcievers (score: 1): Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:44:58 -0600; Dennis, I had been using less than top tier receivers on top band so I can't speak for the best of the Japanese or Ten Tec. I have used a Kenwood TS-570 with 200 Hz crystal filter, a Yaesu FT-857 wit; /archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00013.html (7,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]