Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+4\-square\s+continued\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+4\-square\s+continued\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m 4-square continued (score: 1): Author: Bill@aa6tt.com (William Hein, AA6TT); Date: 27 Jun 2001 11:29:04 -0700; Thank you to everyone who has sent me information re 160m 4-squares. I will relate some of the information I've received here and solicit further comment from the Topband world. I would like to use a; /archives//html/Topband/2001-06/msg00063.html (7,946 bytes)
2. Topband: 160m 4-square continued (score: 1): Author: w5ps@airmail.net (Peter Sears); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:05:46 -0500; Back when I lived in 2-land getting a good ground was very hard so going with an elevated radial system is not a bad idea. I would still lay a radial field below the array, DC grounded to each tower; /archives//html/Topband/2001-06/msg00065.html (6,983 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]