Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+8\-circle\s+BSEF\s+array\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+8\-circle\s+BSEF\s+array\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m 8-circle BSEF array (score: 1): Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:18:32 -0400; I was evaluating the simplicity of the feed system for the 8-circle tx/rx array (4 active elements per steered direction) compared to the 9-circle array (9 active elements per steered direction) in t; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00116.html (7,504 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160m 8-circle BSEF array (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:09:13 GMT; Scott, I use the 8-ele array, and there is absolutely no coupling to the unfed elements. This is because they are VERY short at least in my case (10ft) and nowhere near resonance. In my case they are; /archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00122.html (6,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]