Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+Receivers\s+\-\s+the\s+argument\s+for\s+true\s+DSP\s+\(long\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ireland <sire@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:20:01 +0800
G'day A couple of weeks ago, Tom W8JI wrote a critique of phasing/direct conversion front-ends with DSP 'hearts' for use on 160m in reply to a posting I wrote about them. As I also received a lot of
/archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00105.html (15,732 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:13:33 +1300
I agree. I tried a mixer a few years back using these devices, after being sent a RadCom article by G3PQA, and the performance was indeed impressive. My experience of southern hemisphere operating,
/archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00111.html (8,804 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:14:46 -0400
Hi Steve, I think you missed my points totally. I'd be the first to encourage people to spend money and effort to hear better, but they should also be encouraged to spend money wisely. Rather than ar
/archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00113.html (9,103 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1)
Author: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:52:25 -0500
by the Impulse noise usually requires a group of pulses to have enough energy to be a problem. Even a spark plug generates thousands of individual pulses, and if a noise blanker is to be effective, i
/archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00117.html (12,050 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu