Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+from\s+5X\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+from\s+5X\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: "Nick Henwood" <nick@henwood.demon.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:24:14 +0100; I have been v QRV from 5X in past 5 years. Returning this Oct for 8 weeks and considering how best to get 160 on the air as it is the only band I have not worked and reckon there must be un-met need!; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00333.html (7,613 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: "IZ5MOQ" <iz5moq@rrdxa.eu>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:43:47 +0200; Hello Nick, nice to read you here and nice to know that you are on the way to put 5X on the TopBand. See you on the air, to complete our band slots on 80 and... 160. I do not give you any tech-advice; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00334.html (6,803 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: Ray Benny <rayn6vr@cableone.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:22:56 -0700; Nick, A 50ft tophat vertical is a good antenna. I would suggest that you put down as many 135 ft long radials as possible, at least 25. If this is not feasible, put down as may random lengths radials; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00337.html (8,581 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:10:48 -0400 (EDT); Hi Nick, I was lucky to work Paul, 5X4F, during the late 1990s but there are many unmet needs for 5X on 160 meters. You will be very highly sought after. Verticals are consistently the most effective; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00339.html (10,083 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: Dan Atchison <N3ND@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:27:15 -0400; If you cannot use radials laid on the ground, you could use at least two (ideally more) elevated radials loaded with inductors or the relatively new Folded Counterpoise (FCP);bhowever, the FCP requir; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00340.html (7,511 bytes)
6. Topband: 160M from 5X (score: 1): Author: jon jones <n0jk@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:38:11 +0000; Nick: Another option if feasible would be an Inverted L with the vertical portion 50 feet. These typically have a 50 ohmimpedance with 3 or 4 radials, and work reasonably well. The horizontal portion; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00341.html (8,562 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:45:28 -0400; I have been v QRV from 5X in past 5 years. Returning this Oct for 8 weeks and considering how best to get 160 on the air as it is the only band I have not worked and reckon there must be un-met need!; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00342.html (8,626 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 160m from 5X (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:41:27 -0400; Hi Nick Like many others, I am very glad to hear you will be QRV on Topband. A few suggestions if I may: Operating on Topband has a bit of a learning curve. Not steep, but a few things that may help:; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00343.html (10,008 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]