Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+loaded\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+loaded\s+tower\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m loaded tower (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:44:19 -0800; I have a 100 ft tower with jk mid tri 40 on top. When shunt fed, it was pretty competitive on 160. Recently the antenna seems to be a few db weaker. The only change was adding another beam at 60ft. C; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00097.html (6,360 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160m loaded tower (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:31:29 -0600; Ignacy, Is your thought that you are a few dB weaker based on sone kind of A-B test of the two antenna setups or just that you feel weaker? 73Stan, K5GO Sent from my iPhone _________________ Searchab; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00098.html (7,113 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160m loaded tower (score: 1): Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:47:35 -0500; In a number of QSOs recently, other stations made easy contact and my station struggled. I make sure to exclude stations on the east coast and those with 4sq. Ignacy NO9E _________________ Searchable; /archives//html/Topband/2023-01/msg00102.html (8,305 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]