- 1. Topband: 160m receive performance (score: 1)
- Author: sire at iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland)
- Date: Thu Jun 26 13:10:59 2003
- G'day Reading through the recent postings about receive performance, a couple of things struck me. 1. On the basis of 30 years-plus as a radio amateur (and a couple of years as editor of an amateur r
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00102.html (7,666 bytes)
- 2. Topband: 160m receive performance (score: 1)
- Author: w3uls at 3n.net (John Rippey)
- Date: Thu Jun 26 17:46:48 2003
- Some comments in the posting by Steve, VK6VZ, struck a responsive chord with me. As a not-very-skilled op, I look first for simplicity and second for performance (speaking largely CW here). That's wh
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00106.html (7,400 bytes)
- 3. Topband: 160m receive performance (score: 1)
- Author: otterstad at enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad)
- Date: Thu Jun 26 21:35:14 2003
- ZP6CW came back to my CQ this morning at 0040. My MP 1000MP MK V was in " normal" mode and I just heard somebody in the noise. Once I pushed the knob for DSP and 60 Hz filter Doug came through very n
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00107.html (7,367 bytes)
- 4. Topband: 160m receive performance (score: 1)
- Author: cra at floodcity.net (David Knepper)
- Date: Fri Jun 27 05:25:33 2003
- The best receiver, in my opinion, continues to be the 75A-4. OK, now let'er rip! Why haven't you been to the CRA website? Joined the CRA? or subscribed to the Collins Journal, the only Collins magazi
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00110.html (8,539 bytes)
- 5. Topband: 160m receive performance (score: 1)
- Author: herbs at vitelcom.net (Herbert Schoenbohm)
- Date: Fri Jun 27 09:44:18 2003
- David, I would tend to agree with you although I have not tried a Yaesu FT-1000 series nor done any A/B comparisons. The 75A4 in the 60's was certainly the best there was on top band. By using single
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00112.html (8,845 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu