Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1810\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+1810\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:04:49 +0000; So what do we know so far? No one has used an extremely sharp directional antenna like a loop, but the Beverages, KA9Ys, etc. from Maine to NC seem to be roughly pointing to the mid-Atlantic area lik; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00124.html (7,814 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:12:30 -0400; Hi Guys, Not to sound rude or demeaning, but do you know what I would suggest...? STAY OFF OF 1810-KHz. There's never any DX way down in that part of the band anyway... ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00126.html (7,435 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:23:23 -0400; Likewise, certainly, Eddy, but... STAY OFF OF 1810-KHz. And ignore the fact someone has a technical problem which is intruding into our allocation. Hmm... seems like bad practice on our part to turn; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00128.html (8,610 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Mike Armstrong <armstrmj@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:34:42 -0700; Paul, You took the words right out of my mouth. While I am not in a position to help with this one, if I was I would be "all over it," in the same manner as you guys are doing it now. THANKS to all t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00129.html (9,214 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:35:17 -0600; Oh, so now it's all about DX and not about "the little guy"? Did you forget that 1810 is listed as the QRP frequency? I've heard Jon, AA1K, down around there calling CQ DX several times in the mornin; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00130.html (8,658 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:43:56 +0000 (UTC); It was loud by the ocean here in NJ, grid square FN20xj, at 1100UTC this morning. I'm going to dig out my Palomar Loop and see if I can DF the signal. Mike N2MS ______________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00132.html (7,055 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:03:13 -0400; Hi, This also presupposes that the only reason to even be on top band is to chase after DX. I have no aversion to chatting with DX hams but I am more interested in rag chewing and North American hams; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00141.html (8,145 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:49:03 -0400; Oh Brother...! Who would have thought that the Political Correctness Kops would have migrated down to 1.8-MHz in such earnest...?! A thousand apologies, sahib! I promise that I'll be a good little To; /archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00152.html (8,247 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Dan Flaig NP2J <dan@np2j.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:46:31 -0600; My 2 cents It makes sense to me to have the contest rules mirror the regulations regarding frequency allocations. No one is asking the contest sponsors to regulate anything. Enforcing a frequency rul; /archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00084.html (7,345 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:11:39 -0700; If you have violated the terms of your license that should be a DQ. Changing the frequency makes it even worse as it was an attempt to cover up the action. If USA makes contacts out of band in CQ WW; /archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00085.html (8,749 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1): Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:51:28 -0500; Yes, changing one's log after the fact to cover up a violation is scienter or guilty knowledge, meaning fraud. DQ is the only appropriate action. Lee, AA4GA _________________ Searchable Archives: htt; /archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00088.html (9,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]