Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+3B9EME\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+3B9EME\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:29:39 -0500; 3B9EME has been calling CQ (listening up ~1) on 1822 for over an hour. But they can't seem to hear very well. At one time, they were S7 here in SW Missouri. Someone tell them to put up a Beverage ant; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00135.html (6,947 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:39:43 -0400; Wow! That's a good one!! I worked Jacky, 3B8CF many years ago on 160, but never 3B9! Lowest bands I've ever worked 3B9 were 40 and 30 m. I worked Jacky just before sunset here in Raleigh NC! Worked h; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00136.html (7,923 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:55:02 -0500; Well, they will be on for a few more days. http://www.qrz.com/db/3B9EME http://www.ari.verona.it/veronadxteam/3b9_2013.htm#x:3B9EME_inglese Friday night after sunset on 3505, they were S8 to S9 here.; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00137.html (8,447 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:17:55 -0400; Well, I don't have a 160 transmit antenna at present time, but I do still have the 80m GP. Might give them a try there. I worked Jacky often on 80m. 73, Charlie, K4OTV Wow! That's a good one!! I work; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00140.html (8,881 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 02:18:34 +0000; They were real easy on 80CW a few nights ago, right around sundown. Tim N3QE Well, I don't have a 160 transmit antenna at present time, but I do still have the 80m GP. Might give them a try there. I; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00141.html (9,159 bytes)
6. Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "VE7MID" <ve7mid@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:23:19 -0700; the idea that would be the set-up but, on site, it was impossible. There is a difference between having years to set up a station and days with limited material to accomplish an effective low band s; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00142.html (7,169 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Dave Novoa W4DN" <dnovoa@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:41:07 -0400; This DXpedition has not been particularly strong on any band, specially here in South Florida. Their vertical for the low bands may not be working well, plus they do not mention any receiving antenna; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00143.html (7,543 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:44:45 -0400; Valid points, Keith. I think the boys that went to FO0AAA did good to hang up that KAZ terminated Loop that John, ON4UN, put together for them! Some years ago, My friend, Jim, W4RS and I put together; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00144.html (7,908 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "JC N4IS" <n4is@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 23:04:15 -0400; That's just pure propagation, 160m duct is the most common mode for most DX. 3B9 was peaking 599 in Texas and 589 in KP2. The signal was just not getting down here in South Florida due Es clouds. The; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00145.html (8,107 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:04:28 -0500; Your point is well taken. If I sounded like I was being unappreciative and/or critical of them, I didn't mean to be. I think their main objective was EME, and 160 was kind of an afterthought. However; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00146.html (8,036 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:42:57 -0700 (PDT); Keith you are exactly right. Because it takes some days to check topband antennas and understand their performance, and the effects of propagation, often there is not sufficient time in the dxpeditio; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00149.html (8,494 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Garry Shapiro <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:05:32 -0700; You did not say exactly how many years ago you worked Jacky on 160. In 1999, after a DXpedition to 3B9 in which Jacky was a participant, the homeward-bound DXpeditioners (including myself) were at Ja; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00150.html (9,226 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:15:06 -0400 (EDT); I worked and received a QSL from Jackie for a Topband QSO on 13 Nov 1987. A long time ago! 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Message -- You did not say exactly how many years ago you worked Jacky on 160. In; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00152.html (10,087 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:49:41 +0100; We worked quite a lot of Stateside on 160 from 3B9C (2004). On the way back we met up with Jacky in Port Louis and talked to him about 160 (I had worked Jacky on topband from home back in the 80's, l; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00155.html (11,303 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Charles Otnott <wd5bjt@peoplepc.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:51:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00); No copy here on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. The noise and static were not too horrible. I fell asleep while under the cans. :->> I will be there again tonight as well. --Original Message-- 73 & Best; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00156.html (8,506 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:58:19 -0400; Hi, Garry I did log a QSO, with 3B9R, 4/10/1999 on 15m CW. By then, I had recovered my original K4OTV call from 1957. Over the years, I lost the K4OTV call, because, back then, if we moved to a diffe; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00157.html (11,479 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: <n0tt1@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:24:33 +0000; <snip> And FYI....there was no receiving amplifier used with that antenna on Clipperton. 73, Charlie, N0TT 1 of 12 FO0AAA Oprs. _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00159.html (8,043 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:56:03 -0400; Hi, Charlie I wasn't aware that no preamp was used with the FO0AAA terminated loop. I have modeled the FO0AAA loop in EZNEC, and, because it has a bit more area than my smaller, 40' X 10' KAZ termina; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00160.html (9,304 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:33:58 -0400; BTW, Charlie I did work FO0AAA on 160 CW. 03/04/2000 03:59Z, 1829 KHz 73, Charlie, K4OTV <snip> And FYI....there was no receiving amplifier used with that antenna on Clipperton. 73, Charlie, N0TT 1 o; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00161.html (8,555 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:04:10 -0400; The FO0AAA 160 RX antenna was put together for the operation by Earl Cunningham (SK) K6SE. Earl even wrote a detailed article on the design for QST. Herb, KV4FZ I think the boys that went to FO0AAA d; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00163.html (8,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]