Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+5\/8\s+vertical\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: "John" <ljdoyle@suscom-maine.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:42:45 -0500
got a question..if using a 5/8 wave vertical should the radials also be 5/8 wave long i guessing yes they do...John K1GUN _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band,
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00036.html (6,570 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:41:17 -0800
Yes, As current radiation is raised in the vertical, longer radials are needed. Horizontal antennas are seldom used on 160 meters and below. The up to 6db ground reflection for horizontals up 1/2 wav
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00039.html (7,063 bytes)

3. Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:08:12 -0800 (PST)
OK, I'll bite... Why would you put up a 5/8 wave vertical?  Have you modeled this dog? Now, I suspect you are talking about an inverted L - as the 5/8 vertical is 340 feet...  This is an even bigger
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00041.html (6,788 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:56:18 -0700
If you are asking about a monopole with elevated radials the radials should be 1/4 wavelength. If ground mounted with radials on or in the ground the length is not that important. The feedpoint resis
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00043.html (8,276 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:18:41 -0800
I keep seeing this statement on various reflectors, but my tests on 1/4 wave and 1/2 wave verticals show that a 1/2 wave vertical with essentially no radials works as well as a 1/4 wave vertial with
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00045.html (7,911 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:32:10 +0100
Not necessarily. My elevated radials on 160m are 53m long and that vertical is giving outstanding results. 73 Peter If you are asking about a monopole with elevated radials the radials should be 1/4
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00050.html (7,327 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:50:33 -0800
Only a nibble, not a bite, The question had to do with using a 5/8 wave vertical and radials. In early days of AM radio, and I have spent most of my work life in Broadcasting Engineering, a 5/8 wave
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00051.html (8,899 bytes)

8. Topband: 5/8 vertical (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Hi Bruce, Well, it is horses for courses... The biggest problem for the DX oriented ham with a 5/8 wave will be the very high, and very big (only -5dB) secondary lobe, bringing in a ton of monky chat
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00065.html (8,533 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu