Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+5\/8\s+wavelength\s+vertical\s+is\s+mo\s+betta\s+than\s+shorterversions\?\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:57:16 -0400
), I am well aware that my comments concerning the 5/8ths wave was based upon subjective/anecdotal evidence. I am in a science (Astrophysics) by profession..... I do know the difference. HOWEVER, I c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00086.html (14,487 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:45:12 -0400
False premise alert. There are two different mechanisms involved. One is the pattern distortion (gain) in the horizontal plane produced by current distribution on the double zepp, and amounts to a co
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00094.html (12,073 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:08:47 -0400
I'll do the 3/8 wave case later, Carl. I didn't have time to get back to it today because I got all bolluxed up trying to include an attachment to my reflector post. Also, even trying to embed the do
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00102.html (23,800 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:53:21 -0600
Great job, Charlie AND on the opening weekend of the NFL season, none the less! You are Da Man, ma Mon - you are carrying the water for this "event" and I appreciate your efforts! Jim R. K9JWV ______
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00103.html (25,665 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: Augie Hansen <augie.hansen@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 13:54:04 -0600
On 9/8/2013 1:08 PM, Charlie Cunningham wrote: ... I didn't have time to get back to it today because I got all bolluxed up trying to include an attachment to my reflector post. Also, even trying to
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00104.html (10,621 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:00:30 -0400
Thanks, Jim! Have a good Sunday afternoon/evening! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of James Rodenkirch Sent: Sunday, September
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00105.html (26,756 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:04:46 -0400
Thanks for the tip, Augie! I didn't try the "plain text" approach, but I'll keep it in mind! 73, Charlie,K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00106.html (11,791 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:10:42 -0400
Thanks, Augie I finally just resorted to sending it to interested parties via e-mail. Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Augie Hans
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00107.html (11,358 bytes)

9. Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 07:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
In the early 90's N6KB and I tried a 5/8 wl Vertical on 160m. It was a wire vertical supported by a helium balloon and spaced several hundred feet from a permanent 1/4 wl Vertical. Both antennas had
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00339.html (8,786 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:45:56 -0500
Before you do Niko, read the Brown, Lewis and Epstein RCA report. 73 Clive GM3POI In the early 90's N6KB and I tried a 5/8 wl Vertical on 160m. It was a wire vertical supported by a helium balloon an
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00340.html (9,047 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:52:34 -0500
A lot of hams on 160m have been similarly "shocked". :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00341.html (7,184 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:11:15 -0400
Quite a bit of the radiation from 5/8 wave verticals is at relatively high elevation angles - above 40 degrees elevation. (Perhaps useful for VHF mobiles that need to hit mountain top or hill-top rep
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00342.html (8,991 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:32:41 -0400
I was very fortunate to have a 308 insulated Blau-Knox self supported tower in my back yard with 120 radials all 250' long, in the later 70's and early 80's and when the radio station was off the air
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00343.html (9,990 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:06:23 -0400
Hi Herb. I'll bet that 1/2 wave sloper worked great! When this thread got started, I modeled several verticals in EZNEC from 1/4 wave to 5/8 wave in height. I sent the plots around to folks that were
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00347.html (11,169 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:26:58 -0400
I certainly agree with Richard Fry from a pattern perspective, although my experience with 5/8th wave antennas and other low angle tall verticals over the past 40 years (and I have had several antenn
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00001.html (11,422 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:53:25 -0400
I learned the hard way with a 5/8 wave insulated self standing tower on to band is basically useless for DX work compared to a standard 1/4 or 3/8 wave vertical radiator. As Tom so knowledgeably poin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00003.html (12,867 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu