Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+73\s+mix\s+cores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+73\s+mix\s+cores\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 73 mix cores (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:45:11 -0500; Are you suggesting that Fair-Rite's published data for this part is wrong? Fair-Rite's data is correct. In extensive measurements of certain of their parts, I've not yet seen that. I wouldn't know wh; /archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00164.html (12,119 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 73 mix cores (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:56:48 -0600; Fair-rite also states that multi-aperture ferrite cores (like this one) have greater bandwidth vs. a single-hole core made of the same material. I cannot explain that. I can verify that the losses in; /archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00165.html (9,888 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 73 mix cores (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:13:10 -0500; Fair-rite also states that multi-aperture ferrite cores (like this one) have greater bandwidth vs. a single-hole core made of the same material. I cannot explain that. Increased bandwidth comes from; /archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00166.html (13,651 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]