Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\/B\s+Testing\s+Limits\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\/B\s+Testing\s+Limits\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: w3uls at 3n.net (John Rippey); Date: Tue Jun 24 17:11:02 2003; Ford Peterson's recent posting lists some variables that can affect A/B transceiver comparisons, and have prompted the following observations.. It probably is a practical impossibility to come up wit; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00060.html (8,407 bytes)
2. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue Jun 24 21:43:21 2003; "Time of year, propagation conditions, location, antenna types and condition, operator skills and preferences, modifications made, all play a critical role." == 1) Time of year: All receivers are com; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00063.html (8,337 bytes)
3. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid at verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:13 2003; Earl, K6SE, has written, about his Orion rig tests: And on May 20th, to the Topband reflector he posted the following: "On CW, the S-meter reading is about S-1 on 160m because I have the receiver ban; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00065.html (10,107 bytes)
4. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:16 2003; "Just believe a real explanation about why is deserved. Maybe your ears were different in the test run and reported on May 20th and the test reported on June 18th?" == I explained that on your reflec; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00066.html (7,385 bytes)
5. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid at verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:25 2003; Well, guess all I can say, Earl, is nice try to you. I have looked at every one of your messages posted in June to the Orion Yahoo Group. You never, in any of them, nor on this reflector, even once; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00069.html (8,334 bytes)
6. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:28 2003; "Just believe a real explanation about why is deserved. Maybe your ears were different in the test run and reported on May 20th and the test reported on June 18th?" == Since my explanation about a we; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00070.html (9,964 bytes)
7. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid at verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:31 2003; Aloha all, I asked, And Earl has responded: Oh, well ok, it sounded as if it were an A/B test, but going back and reading your May 20th post, I see you did not claim it to be, fair enough. Earl conti; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00071.html (9,342 bytes)
8. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed Jun 25 06:20:37 2003; "In not one of these do you explain the differences in the SAME test which you describe on May 20th, after which you wonder about selling one of the other two, up to then your "best" rigs, and your J; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00073.html (7,965 bytes)
9. Topband: A/B Testing Limits (score: 1): Author: btippett at alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Wed Jun 25 07:27:33 2003; Hi Earl et al! Thank you for a very plausible explanation! However, this brings up an issue which has been bothering me for some time. There seems to be a general tendency for us to discredit laborat; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00078.html (12,650 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]