- 1. Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Anthony DeBiasi <k2sg@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:09:27 -0500
- The team on Tonga are encountering some bad weather from Cyclone Winston. Winds are 40+ knots, too high to get 160/80 verticals up. http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/pacific/296916/all-of-fiji-urged-to-p
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00092.html (6,465 bytes)
- 2. Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Anthony DeBiasi <k2sg@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:51:27 -0500
- Weather permitting the team plans to erect the 160 antenna today and may be on TopBand as early as this evening. The 80 meter antenna is already up. The team is doing the best they can considering th
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00094.html (6,706 bytes)
- 3. Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Anthony DeBiasi <k2sg@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:05:26 -0500
- Sorry for the broken link. Last try, I hope this works better. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/02/20/cyclone_winston_batters_fi ji.html Cyclone Winston, Strongest Southern Hemisphere Stor
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00095.html (6,790 bytes)
- 4. Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:05:26 +0000
- A35T had a booming signal on 80 meters this morning just south of the Oregon Border. Nil on 160 here though. GL Bob/AA6VB Sent from my iPhone _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00112.html (7,063 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:38:29 -0600
- After looking for them at sunrise for the past 2 days and hearing nothing I decided to try earlier, so I got up at 0900Z and listened for 2 hours. Saw no spots for A35T on 160 and heard nothing. Saw
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00114.html (7,713 bytes)
- 6. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:00:47 -0800
- I listened for a 1/2 hour before and after sunrise here and I occasionally heard them on 160, but never well enough to call. I did manage to work them on 80 meters 1/2 hour after sunrise. They were a
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00115.html (8,103 bytes)
- 7. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Charlie <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:37:31 -0600
- The ops have made a valiant effort since they were able to install the low band antennas. The prop has not cooperated. On 80M here in WV they have not been strong. I had to work them twice on 80 beca
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00116.html (10,425 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: MU 4CX250B <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:38:21 -0700
- Very weak this AM 1300-1345z, in New Mexico. Barely out of noise,with QSB. Many CQs with nobody replying. Usually have a pipeline into Pacific. 80m was bad, too. 73, Jim w8zr _________________ Topban
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00117.html (7,568 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:56:33 -0800
- Nor do I. Perhaps a poor TX antenna -- vertical with no radials? Maybe low power? Something caused them to not be on the band at their sunset. They did a self spot around 0515Z saying they would be o
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00119.html (9,229 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: "Milt" <miltn5ia@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:34:33 -0700
- I was fortunate to work them this AM on 160 M. However, the problem was hearing their signal. It was weak, as it was the previous morning when I listened only to a few dits. IMHO their signal is at l
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00123.html (10,647 bytes)
- 11. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Mike - W5JR <w5jr.lists@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:33:22 -0500
- Congrats Milt. Still waiting to hear them over here. Going down to the wire. tnx Mike / W5JR Alpharetta GA _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00124.html (11,309 bytes)
- 12. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:17:42 -0800
- My QSO at 6am local was confirmed in LOTW by 5pm! 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00125.html (8,031 bytes)
- 13. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Lawson <n6rw@cox.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 01:37:06 -0700
- A35T calling CQ right now on 1821.6 with solid signal - no spotlight and looooooong before sunrise here tonight. My QSO at 6am local was confirmed in LOTW by 5pm! 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topba
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00126.html (8,315 bytes)
- 14. Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:32:08 -0600
- They hear well but their TX, 339, is weak. Got a 1 minute opening (seriously) around SR and made the contact. Doug/VA5DX I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could. --Original M
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00129.html (9,344 bytes)
- 15. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:36:50 +0000
- Same thing happened to me with the T88 a few years back. Sat in front of the radio for hours for seven days listening to nothing but static. On the very last day for less than a minute, they came out
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00130.html (8,355 bytes)
- 16. Re: Topband: A35T (score: 1)
- Author: Larry via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:58:43 -0500
- I have been listening for a few days now. They have never had a readable signal until last night. For about 2 hours they were S7-S9 and hearing very well. Actually much better than the east coast sta
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00135.html (10,565 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu