Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+160\s+contest\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: Tom Homewood" <w1to@abs.adelphia.net (Tom Homewood); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:18:39 -0500; I am working with a group to try an get the N1MM Logger program ready for the contest this weekend. The group is very close, but have some unanswered questions. 1. How many points are scored for a Ma; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00036.html (7,987 bytes)
2. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:36:59 -0800; "How many points are scored for a Maritme Mobile or Aeronautical Mobile QSO?" -- Because they're mentioned in section 4.2 (Contest exchange for DX) of the rules, they must be 5-pointers and count for; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00050.html (8,616 bytes)
3. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK); Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:29:18 -0800 (PST); ARRL Field Organization seems to be saying that PAC section includes all of the KH*'s : "Pacific -- Hawaii and U.S. possessions in the Pacific" <http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/org/secinfo.html> See; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00057.html (8,280 bytes)
4. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: jcclark@prexar.com (Craig Clark); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:54:53 -0500; Gentleman: Pete's question was not specifically about the window. Let's not mix messages. It was abt a lack of DX activity. There has never been a compelling reason for DX stations to participate in; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00149.html (9,542 bytes)
5. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:56:44 -0500; Actually, I was kinda asking both questions. I think the underlying thought may have been "maybe I didn't hear more DX because the DX window seemed to be nonexistent. Jeff's message about the DX wind; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00154.html (8,655 bytes)
6. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: k5na@texas.net (Richard L. King); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:04:24 +0000; I agree with Craig with almost everything he said except for this: To win the ARRL 160M Contest you must work lots of DX. There is no exception to this. The domestic QSOs in this contest are usually; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00159.html (8,197 bytes)
7. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:02:04 -0500; Much of the enjoyment of this contest for me is the challenge of working dx. The more dx I can work, the more competitive I can be with stations more centrally located in the US who are going to mak; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00160.html (8,129 bytes)
8. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:51:14 -0500; Amen. Craig hit the problem right on the head, at least so far as DX is concerned. The real problem is many people who rarely work 160, or who are parked on a coastline with all the US behind them,; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00162.html (8,343 bytes)
9. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (zl3ix@inet.net.nz); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:42:32 GMT; Let me give the point of view of one particular DX station. I went into the shack after supper on Saturday (abt 08z), fully intending to "give it a bash". I tuned around the band to see what there w; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00171.html (8,295 bytes)
10. Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (Tom Baugh); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:43:02 -0500; My feeling is.. If you didn't honor the following rule: 6.1. The segment 1.830 to 1.835 should be used for intercontinental QSOs only. NOTE the word "SHOULD" I'm sure people will say, It doesn't say; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00173.html (8,000 bytes)
11. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:42:34 -0800; Will, K6NDV and I were planning to operate from the salt lake bed this weekend in the ARRL 160 contest, but unfortunately Will has to work today We are still planning to operate there for the Stew Pe; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00004.html (6,199 bytes)
12. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:26:31 -0800; Many more reports on the salt lake bed operation of K6SE have come in -- all positive and encouraging. Many thanks! Two corrections to the post about the operation I made the other day: 1) Final numb; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00074.html (7,055 bytes)
13. TopBand: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 19:59:47 EST; Dear Topbanders, The phenomenon of East Coast stations not hearing the West Coast at our sunset apparently didn't exist Friday afternoon here. VE3EJ appeared with a good signal at 2302 UTC. When he c; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00123.html (8,126 bytes)
14. TopBand: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@TCI.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 08:59:38 -0700; I had a similar experience from Colorado. Saturday afternoon the band was alive and I was able to work about 70 stations before sunset. Only worked one DX station P40P who had a nice signal and very; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00135.html (7,295 bytes)
15. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ed Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:19:59 -0500; Conditions seemed to be pretty good here last night & this morning...actually worked my first "5T5" station on Top-Band! This morning I managed to work Canada from the proverbial "...sea-to-shining-s; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00015.html (7,308 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 02:38:06 -0600; Conditions were good here last night too, but noisy tonight and not so good both. 73 fer nw, Bob AD5VJ 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177 http://www.n5iet.com/ Code may be taking a back seat for now,; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00019.html (8,407 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1): Author: "WS6X" <ws6x@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:44:15 -0800; Thot I'd throw out my one & one-half cents worth. Both evenings of the contest at 45 minutes on either side of local sunset, the Central Valley of CA had pipeline condx to the Caribbean. Friday at 3:; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00029.html (7,471 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:09:51 -0400; Thanks for the comments Ron. For some reason I just can't think of how in a 160 meter international contest that if you work KH6 you get no additional multiplier for working Guam, Wake Island, Swains; /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00502.html (9,641 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: Jim Bennett <w6jhb@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:27:09 -0800; Herb & All - I'm here on the West Coast and have the same "issues" with this contest as many other folks. I enter it not with ANY expectation of winning - well, OK, I'll bet big dollars that I'm goin; /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00503.html (10,708 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 contest (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:54:10 -0800; But, in my experience, only in the early morning hours after EU is in daylight and those east coast stations who are still awake have started listening to the west. My best results to the east coast; /archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00504.html (7,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]