Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+CW\s+SS\s+started\.\s+Why\s+is\s+nobody\s+on\s+160\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:34:51 -0500
I just tuned across the low end of 160, and nothing (except one RTTY signal)! Is my receiver broke? I expected to hear at least SOME CW. I did just get struck by lightning a few days ago; maybe I hav
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00000.html (7,390 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 19:43:22 -0700
We have a saying in the Northern California Contest Club: If you're on 160 during SS, you are losing. Rick N6RK President NCCC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.co
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00001.html (7,820 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 21:51:15 -0500
Thanks, Rick. But some of us are more interested in 160 meters than winning a contest. :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00002.html (7,720 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 22:03:08 -0500
Hi Jim, So THAT'S it! It's the ARRL's fault! :-) I didn't realize that "once per band" was missing from this contest. Thanks and 73, Mike www.w0btu.com Amen. I get on 160 as often as I can - trying t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00003.html (7,627 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: john <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:50:13 -0600
Since there is no Mult advantage on 160m and you can not dupe stations worked on other bands, there is little reason for 160. Almost everyone you would work on 160 will be big on 80. John K9DX ______
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00004.html (8,620 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:39:18 -0400
About 25 years ago I was the only station in the VI on CW SS and in protest to the ARRL's contest policies I was exclusively on 160....problem was that there was no spotting back then and I only work
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00005.html (9,312 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: ARRL CW SS started. Why is nobody on 160? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:05:04 -0800
This year, I missed VI for the first time in years. It would have spoiled my usual sweep except I also missed NT. Didn't a big contest station in VI shut down recently? Rick N6RK _________________ To
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00007.html (8,236 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu