Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+DXCC\s+\-\s+160\s+Meters\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 15:51:41 +0200
Yes " Here you can query Logbook to find out the last time log data was uploaded for a particular call sign. Last upload for OK1YQ: No log data found " Nick, UY0ZG Clive GM3POI 2018-11-17 15:37: Ther
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00141.html (10,830 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: w5zn@w5zn.org
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:08:06 -0700
Thanks JC. LoTW does in fact require a QSO check from the other station for the confirmation to occur. Unless the other station uploads QSO details a confirmation does not occur. I'm not suggesting t
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00142.html (11,148 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:09:52 +0200
How can they (checker ) not pay attention to this result ( 339 ! ) ? Nick, UY0ZG The DXCC standings list is generated automatically from the DXCC records (not LotW). OK1YQ (OK1RD) has been "cheating"
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00143.html (10,902 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 09:22:46 -0500
The checker does not know the total. That number is only in the DXCC records at ARRL. 73, ... Joe, W4TV How can they (checker ) not pay attention to this result ( 339 ! ) ? Nick, UY0ZG Joe Subich, W4
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00144.html (11,479 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:25:05 -0600
Apparently, all he wants to do is hang the award on his shack wall, either to impress visitors or himself?? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_to
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00145.html (9,823 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:32:22 +0200
Joe ! To the checker was declared all 339. No doubt ! Nick, UY0ZG Joe Subich, W4TV 2018-11-17 16:22: The checker does not know the total. That number is only in the DXCC records at ARRL. 73, ... Joe,
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00146.html (11,386 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 09:38:10 -0500
He could upload under a previous call.... Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00147.html (12,126 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "w5zn@w5zn.org" <w5zn@w5zn.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:45:23 -0600
Thanks JC. LoTW does in fact require a QSO check from the other station for the confirmation to occur. Unless the other station uploads QSO details a confirmation does not occur. Im not suggesting th
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00148.html (10,852 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 10:08:36 -0500
Clive GM3POI" Thanks Clive. I was under the mistaken impression that ARRL had closed the previous loopholes in their paper card process but that is clearly not the case. This (paper cheating on 160
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00149.html (9,140 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:18:58 -0700
I can carry one card to an approved 160 field checker and get it approved.  He has no idea what my total are. Wes  N7WS Joe ! To the checker was declared all 339. No doubt ! Nick, UY0ZG Joe Subich, W
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00151.html (12,086 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:22:47 -0300
but he must have an idea if it´s a "possible" contact! Some months ago, my manager (my Mom) did an error with the time filling a JA QSL on topband. This JA asked me for a new QSL with the right time,
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00152.html (12,876 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 18:09:37 +0200
Ok my friend. But in this case all 339 were presented ! Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Wes Stewart 2018-11-17 17:18: I can carry one card to an approved 160 field checker and get it approved. 
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00154.html (12,196 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Bob W4DR" <w4dr@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 11:23:02 -0500
The last LOTW log update for both OK7XX and OK1RD was April 2009. Bob W4Dr --Original Message-- From: uy0zg Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:09 AM To: Wes Stewart Cc: topband@contesting.com Subje
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00155.html (12,802 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:23:40 -0500
Folks, Hopefully the ARRL will look into this and act in a way we all will be satisfied but they can't act until they have done their own due diligence. Informing DXCC about it is the best we can hop
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00158.html (10,009 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:23:45 -0500
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD John k9uwa _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00162.html (8,484 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:30:13 -0500
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD John k9uwa _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00163.html (8,128 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Pete N8PR <n8pr@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 01:15:15 +0000 (UTC)
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ ..... Who is it ?? http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1&zoom=a uto,-12,848 --  Nick, UY0ZG _________________ From: w5zn@w5zn.org To:
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00165.html (9,193 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Paolo Zaffi <i4ewh1@tin.it>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 12:47:11 +0100
(or overworked ARRL staff person at a hamfest). It was made at Friedrichshafen in 2008 and he was listed in the pdf file "DXCC Standings". In 2009 he was removed from the file. I have those files in
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00166.html (8,015 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: w5zn@w5zn.org
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:20:57 -0700
I haven't really followed the 160 meter DXCC card checking process closely since I retired from ARRL elected volunteer service almost 10 years ago and after my good friend Dave NN1N departed I lost a
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00189.html (11,145 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1)
Author: k1zm--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
Joel Quite a few 160m friends have sent emails to Sharon Tarantula - and she has replied to each of us - saying the matter will be investigated. Thanks for your support of this matter. 73 JEFF In a m
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00191.html (11,563 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu