Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+LOTW\s+and\s+More\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+ARRL\s+LOTW\s+and\s+More\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "herbs" <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:41:34 -0400; After several frustrating weeks of trying to figure out why my ARRL LOTW uploads were not registering I decided to contact the company. It seems they are back logged beyond comprehension. Not even th; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00505.html (8,108 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Dave Clouser <dave@nz3m.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:05:53 -0500; The queue is currently almost 10 days behind. You can track it here http://www.arrl.org/logbook-queue-status Everyone keeps uploading over and over and over because they don't see their QSO's, which; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00506.html (9,564 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:08:10 -0500; Herb, Calling KP2 and KP4 DX for the ARRL 160 Meter Contest would mean that you *could not work DX.* You have bitched for years that DX thought the could not work you - I can find the references in t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00507.html (10,294 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:41:50 -0400; Joe, I don't ask for both....just wish to be treated the same way as another station a few miles north (VP2V) . Actually there is little "DX" on during this contest compared to the others like CQ and; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00508.html (11,022 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:11:25 -0800; On 12/18/2012 2:05 PM, Dave Clouser wrote: The queue is currently almost 10 days behind. You can track it here http://www.arrl.org/logbook-queue-status Everyone keeps uploading over and over and over; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00509.html (9,107 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:11:35 -0500; ARRL 160 meter contest is based on *Sections*. KP2 and KP4 are *SECTIONS* as are South Florida, North Florida, West Central Florida and any other section. It makes no earthly sense to change the rule; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00510.html (12,271 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:26:20 -0800; ARRL 160 meter contest is based on *Sections*. Only in part -- it's also based on DX entities as multipliers, and US/VE stations get 2.5X the point credit for a QSO with a DX station. It makes no ear; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00511.html (8,489 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:07 +0000; Zone 5 advantage? Top LP scores in ARRL 160 are consistently from the midwest (Zone 4). Tim N3QE ________________________________________ From: Topband [topband-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of J; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00512.html (9,609 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:14:48 -0400; On 12/18/2012 7:11 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: You have bitched for years that DX thought the could not work you - I can find the references in the archives going back almost to be beginning of this; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00513.html (10,167 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:17:21 -0500; I use Logic software for normal logging, awards tracking and for contesting. I should learn N1MM for when I help out with a team effort and if they use that. I believe the author was one of the origi; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00514.html (15,673 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: George Dubovsky <n4ua.va@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:20:09 -0500; It's a contest - I don't care if I miss KP4 and KP2 as long as everyone else does too! 73, geo - n4ua _______________________________________________ It is undesirable to believe a proposition when t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00515.html (9,538 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:05:04 -0500; ARRL 160 Meter contest is essentially a 160 Sweepstakes that allows W/VE stations to work DX. If you don't like the format of the contest, don't work it ... after all, there were no VE8, VY1, etc. s; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00516.html (12,100 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Ashton Lee <Ashton.R.Lee@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:22:03 -0700; Let's not lose the fact that contests on 160 are events as much as contests they are times when an otherwise barren band fills up. There's a lot of fun just in working all you can. Those of us in dee; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00517.html (13,777 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:29:05 -0500; I meant to say I believe the author of the Logic logging software was one of the original authors for the LOTW format. Gary KA1J _______________________________________________ It is undesirable to; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00518.html (8,225 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:49:30 -0500; And while you're at it, why shouldn't SO Assisted be separated from Multi-single? That is a relic of the earliest days of packet, and hasn't made sense for at least 20 years. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00521.html (10,353 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Buck wh7dx <wh7dx@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:05:40 -1000; You can go to the link below to see current status. They are about 10 days behind. They posted a notice saying they are upgrading the system.. perhaps 5-7 weeks now. Today, technology is cheap and fa; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00524.html (9,212 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: k6xt <k6xt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:25:20 -0700; Maybe because XE is in NA while Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Venezuela are not. And maybe, Mexican states are as important to Mexicans as US States and VE provinces are to their northern neighbors.; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00526.html (8,893 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:34:14 -0800 (PST); As Joe stated, if the rules do not appeal to you, don't operate. This is why I haven't operated in the ARRL 160 for years as it really is a 160M SS, and I've never found the "normal" SS to be all tha; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00531.html (9,580 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:53:13 -0800; That's a "favored operator's" view of things. There are, for all practical purposes, three major 160M contests (ARRL, and the two CQWW events), and their rules all strongly favor the Atlantic basin c; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00533.html (9,868 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:58:49 -0500; I meant to say I believe the author of the Logic logging software was one of the original authors for the LOTW format. Data Interchange Format (ADIF), which was developed in 1996 by Ray WF1B and Den; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00538.html (9,885 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]