Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Amateur\s+Radio\s+Station\s+Callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Amateur\s+Radio\s+Station\s+Callsigns\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Amateur Radio Station Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:39:17 -0400; Every time the issue of station callsigns comes up I hear all kinds of very inventive distortions of the rules to justify what hams are doing. A quick trip to the FCC site elicited the following unde; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00089.html (7,226 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Amateur Radio Station Callsigns (score: 1): Author: "m.r.c." <mrc02@kinderteacher.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:32:50 -0700; Part of the anomalies in the regs that I am trying to show. They are "fixing" the problem with some of these words, and they do not work properly. The license does not assign a station location. Ther; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00094.html (9,362 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Amateur Radio Station Callsigns (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:18:20 -0400; This does NOT satisfy the requirements of 97.119(a)! Give us the FCC part number that allows the type of operation that you describe here. Roger N1RJ On 10/13/2019 12:32 PM, m.r.c. wrote: Part of the; /archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00099.html (8,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]