Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+An\s+observation\s+about\s+Topband\s+contesting\s+technique\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: Cormac Gebruers <ei4hq.mail@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:05:54 +0000
Hi All, This weekend I spent a bit of time dipping in to the ARRL 160m contest. Something that has struck me a lot over the past few contests on topband struck me yet again last night and I figured i
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00058.html (12,153 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 20:41:16 -0500
I agree 100%, I run alot.. but im FAR FAR from big.. my rule of thumbs is... Calling CQ TEST.. leave enough room between CQ's to hear your own call 2x in a row 10wpm LESS that your CQ'ing at.. I gene
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00066.html (14,509 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:35:32 -0600
since I have a very weak signal (24w ERP from a 7' tall vertical) when I get ask for a repeat of my call I send it again at the original speed but 90% of the time I end up having to repeat more than
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00067.html (8,312 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: Steven Raas <sjraas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:50:38 -0500
Could be Sam, I do know that here with my set up ( pretty sad to be honest hihi ) That most of the weak ones I work on QSB peaks .. which only last for 15 or so seconds.. It really depends on the con
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00071.html (10,336 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:34:36 -0500
Hi Steve, I might be somebody who would slow down "too much" - maybe not all the way down to ten WPM. If I have my keyer on the "sweet spot" I am reluctant to change it so I probably would grab the s
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00082.html (10,012 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:23:47 -0500
Just a heads up on what was going on, on this side of the pond: Conditions from East Coast US to West Coast US were very unoptimal. Those west coast multipliers are very valuable and there's a bunch
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00094.html (8,763 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 07:27:32 -0500
Just a heads up on what was going on, on this side of the pond: Conditions from East Coast US (Maryland) to West Coast US were very unoptimal. Those west coast multipliers are very valuable and ther
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00118.html (8,843 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:27:56 -0500 (EST)
I'm also sure that you cannot equate signal strength between stations in the same general vicinity. I've heard and worked stations that others in the area couldn't, and vice-versa. Not an unusual phe
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00119.html (9,315 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu