Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Another\s+non\-traditional\s+antenna\s+working\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:10:22 -0500
To see the RBN, go to http://reversebeacon.net/srch.php Type in N3ND, hit enter.  Look for the 160m spots around 03z 15 Nov. The 03z spots are at 400 watts. The 00z spots were at 100 watts, before t
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00116.html (7,928 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "W0UCE" <w0uce@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:40:38 -0500
Top Banders: Further to Guy's report, N3ND's Inverted U Antenna is the third operational Top Band Antenna employing K2AV's Folded Counterpoise(FCP)versus raised or buried radials. The other two are I
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00119.html (8,769 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:22:27 -0800
It seems to me that the folded counterpoise is equivalent to a couple of loaded short radials, except that "linear loading" is used instead of lumping loading coils. Thus the ground induction loss is
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00120.html (7,879 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:22:35 -0500
Is there more info available on this antenna? Especially a diagram (or crude drawing) of how things are done would be appreciated. A NEC model would be fantastic, but I'd be more than happy to prepar
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00122.html (8,270 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:08:41 -0700
For short radials make them equal lengths and load using a single coil. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00123.html (9,494 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:51:36 -0500
This antenna started out as a "U", but in trimming it back to resonance (folded counterpoise plus isolation transformer plus antenna length), the down part of the "U"s up, over and down got nearly el
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00124.html (10,750 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: w7dra@juno.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:33:43 -0800
not forgetting my 2010 CQWW 160 award (counter poise + 120 up 130 over) mike w7dra ____________________________________________________________ 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33 The Stunning Results of Her Wr
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00127.html (11,821 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:12:36 -0500
Hi Rick, We need to look at the current distribution and amplitudes on a 5/16 wave single wire folded counterpoise (FCP) quite carefully. It really is NOT the same as two loaded 1/16 wave radials. Th
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00128.html (17,086 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "W0UCE" <w0uce@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:42:57 -0500
Rick: Just to confirm what Guy mentioned regarding the visual impact of FCPs... They can truly be made virtually invisible from a distance even when a person knows where to look. I know this for fact
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00129.html (17,913 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:04:39 -0500
Guy, Why is an isolation transformer required and not a simple tapped or series (as appropriate to the impedance of the vertical element) coil with a high quality common mode choke? What is the spaci
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00130.html (20,387 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:06:08 -0800
Your analysis IMHO doesn't take into account coupling between the two conductors in the open wire line. I would characterize the above as a 33 foot radial in series with two 33 foot shorted stubs. A
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00131.html (10,254 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:10:32 -0500
Hi, Richard, A bit of errata to correct my previous post: The difference in current will not be as large as I stated in my last post, because for the pair of 1/16 radials I did not divide the source
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00134.html (14,004 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:16:46 -0500
My 1988 CQ 160 top USA winner was a 90' shunt fed tower with a 10-20M stack of 4 el on top. It also accounted for over 200 countries in about 3 years. This was on a 1 acre lot and some of the Beverag
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00135.html (14,280 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:11:41 -0500
Hi, Carl, I repeat, a folded counterpoise is NO substitute for a dense and uniform system, which is what you had in the end. My question for you is if you had a 70 x 10 foot strip of that rocky stuff
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00137.html (10,328 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "W0UCE" <w0uce@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:04:37 -0500
Ya... Camouflage works... Hi, Carl, I repeat, a folded counterpoise is NO substitute for a dense and uniform system, which is what you had in the end. My question for you is if you had a 70 x 10 foot
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00139.html (10,855 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Jon Kåre Hellan <hellan@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:26:47 +0100
A diagram would help a lot. Even better if you show the current distribution. 74 Jon LA4RT, Trondheim, Norway _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00140.html (8,604 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:27:57 -0500
You sort of lost me a day or so Guy as the posts were getting way too long and boring (-; that I deleted after the first page. It appears that the FCP sort of took over the radial discussion somewher
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00141.html (12,868 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:38:02 -0800
See http://www.w0uce.net/K2AVantennas.html _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00143.html (10,496 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu