Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Another\s+take\s+on\s+power\s+line\s+noise\s+hunting\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:44:08 -0500
I've been following this discussion with interest. I spent the summer tracking down more than 20 sources of power line noise. As an offshoot of that I've made it my mission to help clean up RFI in my
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00033.html (10,602 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:17:45 -0500 (EST)
Hi Paul, You would helpful a step attenuator, in 1 dB steps, to be a valuable addition to your tool bag. There are situations where it helps isolate to an individual pole. Its much more accurate than
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00034.html (12,496 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:41:55 +0000
Similar observations here Paul in my never ending battle to keep on top of the noise situation in my rural area - mainly 14.4 kv distribution and some 25kv 3 phase stuff. Many sources top out above 1
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00035.html (15,041 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:47:33 -0500
In the vehicle I often like to use an old (i.e. analogue and inexpensive) spectrum analyser like some of the portable Texscan CATV ones. As CATV companies have transitioned from NTSC to QAM channel l
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00036.html (8,584 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 08:15:45 -0500
Thanks for adding to the discussion Don. That reminds me I forgot a couple of important details so I'm replying on-list to add them. I hadn't thought about using a spectrum analyzer even though I'm w
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00041.html (14,436 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 06:40:53 -0500
Or, since you don't really need a calibrated result, build a simple variable attenuator. Just about anything works so long as you can vary the sensitivity as you approach the power line. 73, Pete N4Z
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00043.html (12,928 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:57:07 -0500
Re a portable oscilloscope to look at noise signatures (the number of "points" on the waveform is a basic but good way and u can usually discern multiple sources too) is to use a audio spectrum analy
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00045.html (15,607 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Another take on power line noise hunting (score: 1)
Author: Greg Chartrand <w7my@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:33:05 -0800 (PST)
I use an old IC-202 (2m battery powered ssb/cw transceiver). It has a whip antenna and provides a very directive null off of the tip of the whip.  -- Greg Chartrand - W7MY Richland, WA. DN-06IF W7MY
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00057.html (7,919 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu