Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+Impedance\s+vs\s+efficiency\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:43:49 -0600
Topbanders! The repository of all (ok most) knowledge about RF... Some time ago, I gave a seminar to the local radio club about SWR. To provide an illustration, I used a visual explanation including
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00275.html (8,059 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:18:40 -0500
about SWR. To provide an illustration, I used a visual explanation including a garden hose--actually a series of various diameter garden hoses tied end-to-end. I explained that any transition from o
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00281.html (12,330 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:21:10 -0500
It is the ratio of electric intensity to magnetic intensity, in the "far" or "radiation" field. No, there isn't. No. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ Topband ma
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00283.html (7,150 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:36:14 -0800
Good question, Ford. The impedance of free space describes the ratio of the electric field to the magnetic field for a propagating plane wave. IOW, if the electric field in a plane wave is 377 volts/
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00284.html (9,624 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:56:22 -0600
________________ First, it's not measured. The impedance of free space (377 ohms) is a mathematical construct, obtained by solving Maxwell's equations for an ideal isotropic radiator (point source),
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00285.html (8,584 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:29:55 -0700
Is there any intrinsic loss attributable to coupling a relatively low impedance system to the high impedance of free space? E.g. is there any benefit to using a higher impedance system? == Hi, Ford.
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00286.html (9,200 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <rimradio@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:09:20 -0700
Upon further reflection (no pun intended), I think my speculation is off base. The field radiated from an antenna is a function only of the current through it, so it probably has no relationship to t
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00290.html (8,237 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:00:05 -0600
...snip... Ken, and others... When I gave that seminar on SWR to the local club, my biggest concern was trying to provide a visual image of what is happening with a transmission line, reflections on
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00305.html (9,790 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Antenna Impedance vs efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:15:44 -0500
biggest concern was trying to provide a visual image of what is happening with a transmission line, reflections on the line, and the resultant loss of signals due to the line losses. The biggest tro
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00308.html (10,124 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu