Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+for\s+160\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Antenna\s+for\s+160\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Antenna for 160? (score: 1): Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT); I just had an idea that I figured I would run by the group and see what everyone thinks. I don't have any supports here for wire antennas, other than the house (no trees, no flag pole, no tower). Ive; /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00173.html (8,292 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Antenna for 160? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:18:05 -0700; feed That can work. See http://audiosystemsgroup.com/K9YC/k9yc160TopLoad.htm No, it is NOT an issue. A connection to the earth matters ONLY for lightning protection. That's important, but it has noth; /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00175.html (8,499 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Antenna for 160? (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:33:08 EDT; Back in my early days when I had a central Electronics 20A. an old timer in our club (W8CTY) told me to get on 160 just take my 80 mtr inverted vee coax and short out the end of the PL259 together an; /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00176.html (6,777 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]