Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Band\s+coming\s+alive\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "David Raymond" <daraymond@iowatelecom.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:41:46 -0500
Topband brought a nice surprise this morning here in Iowa with a QSO with Topband stalwart Bobby, VK3ZL, coming through the QRN with a nice signal. With the poor sunspot activity lasting this far int
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00026.html (6,554 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:52:47 -0700
I've had a rig on 160M for a week looking for stations with whom I can exchange signal reports on a new antenna. So far, except for about an hour during NAQP SSB Saturday night, the only station I've
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00035.html (7,581 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: f5phw@free.fr
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:56:35 +0200 (CEST)
Hello everybody. Tried yesterday night on 160 with short inverted L (description on my website) and 400 watts. QSO ZL4AS 559, JA7QVU 579 AND k9yc 559 who received me 339. That's all. Heard FK8CP 599
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00038.html (9,319 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:56:11 -0700
I guess we have to define "dead band"! NM7M used the phrase "socialogical factor" to describe the situation whereby the ionosphere is in good shape but nobody is there because they are asleep or act
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00039.html (8,719 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hello Jim, I'm sure I speak for everyone else in this group (with lots more 160 experience than I do) when I say that we would simply love to give whatever encouragement that we possibly can to any n
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00043.html (8,963 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: kd6nrp@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:57:47 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Good Morning: It might be helpful to create a separate e-mail list for beginner and intermediate level 160- and 80-meter operators. The topics covered could include antennas, propagation, which frequ
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00044.html (10,567 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:14:15 -0700
This is an excellent idea..... would make it easier for the newbie to learn and have fun as they did so...... -- Original Message -- From: <kd6nrp@earthlink.net> To: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Th
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00046.html (11,238 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:28:18 -0700
I am not sure this would really work. I think this list is the right place for doing all of this. If we make two lists - then likely one list would die. If anyone wants a signal report when I am CQin
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00047.html (7,992 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Solomon" <w1ksz@q.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:59:00 -0700
And just what criteria would be used to separate the "Beginner and Intermediate" from the "Big Guns" ? And who would make that determination ?? Just musing on a quiet day in the Desert. 73, Dick, W1K
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00048.html (9,277 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Charles Moizeau <w2sh@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:33:24 -0400
I certainly believe that having two separate lists would not be helpful to anyone. With a single list, the OT and the Newbie can use the delete key; the former if bored by the need to re-read a well-
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00050.html (10,546 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Eldridge" <eldridge@direct.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:49:24 -0700
I agree with Tree. I think the reflector is fine the way it is. Any question gets lots of response. Bob VE7BS _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00051.html (9,806 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Art K6XT <k6xt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:49:35 -0600
Not that this will help much with the usual UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK reports since those sigs are often 20dB into the noise. Some of us which includes me will be running a SDR and CW Sk
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00053.html (9,530 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Björn Mohr <bm@broadcast.se>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 11:53:41 +0200
I have my SDR running on 160 starting tonight if anyone likes to see if signals reach into SM. It uses a Clifton Labs active RX antenna in rural/quiet environment. You can follow the spots on reverse
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00057.html (8,826 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
Author: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:22:40 -0400
Worked FK8CP this AM. I have been trying for three years and finally got through. Maybe the 10 new radials I added to the inverted L last weekend actually did something. Les W2LK Rifton, NY _________
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00069.html (8,130 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu