Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beacon\s+update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beacon\s+update\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Beacon update (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:08:12 -0700; Thanks for the many reports. I would say that the results are not totally conclusive yet - but a few stations did report hearing the 1999.5 beacon better than the lower frequency one. I did some twea; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00017.html (6,583 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Beacon Update (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:00:22 -0400; Do people need to adjust for a high-Q (narrow bandwidth) antenna, where the higher frequency will likely be out of bandwidth with attenuated RX ability? Kenny K2KW ___________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00020.html (6,940 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Beacon Update (score: 1): Author: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>; Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:00:04 -0400; When I listened (and I was one who reported maybe a very slight advantage to 1999.5, despite the presence of a little more local noise up there), the beacon was very light copy in either case, down n; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00022.html (9,254 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: Beacon update (score: 1): Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>; Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 18:27:17 -1000; At 0415z 45 mins before sunset the 1999.5 signal is louder. As sunset gets closer the signals are the same, after sunset the sigs are the same. Appears the difference is before and after sunset/sunri; /archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00037.html (7,799 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]