Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Best\s+160\s+antenna\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: gary mankoff <garyjm88@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 09:07:33 -0700
Hi everyone I finally have some land to do a 160 meter antenna Lots of tall trees May I have some input as to what people are using on 160 Gary N6biz Sent from my iPad _________________ Topband Refle
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00033.html (6,849 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez (CX6VM-CW5W)" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 13:31:33 -0300
Hi Gary Congratulations! Best or what people are using? For best maybe you can take a look at VY2ZM antennas :-) What people are using, maybe and inv L, vertical with lot of radials, 1/2 wl sloper I
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00034.html (7,415 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:13:05 -0500
Gary, I've compiled some useful information about this at www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html. Maybe you can use those trees as supports for a few elevated radials under an inverted-L! Scroll down to the l
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00036.html (7,540 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Furrey <mikefurrey@att.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 17:53:29 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Gary, For many years I used an inverted L between two tall pine trees and one elevated radial that was L shaped to fit on the 90' x 60' lot I had in Spring, TX. The radial was about 15' up and it
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00037.html (7,737 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:11:15 -0500
The importance of a ferrite choke balun at the feedpoint cannot be overemphasized. A good design for 160m is 5 or 6 turns of coax wound through five stacked 2.4" 31-material ferrite toroids. Photos a
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00039.html (7,633 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Alan Swinger <awswinger@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 17:04:17 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Also try an Inverted L and elevated radials (4-6 100 ft) for 160 & 80M. See the QST 2012 article by Scott, K4VWK. I am using this antenna now and for the past two yrs w/ great success. Good luck - Al
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00040.html (9,237 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Delibert <radio75a3@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:46:08 +0000
Ive found it useful to put a ferrite choke balun at each end one at the antenna and one at the receiver. Jim Brown, K9YC, has some helpful stuff on the internet about this. Sent from Mail<https://go.
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00044.html (9,139 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 20:03:03 -0400
I have 90 ft trees and I have a 1/4 wave draped over the top of them. I have gone with elevated radials and in ground radials at different times. I have a unun in place and a choke to provide a DC gr
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00045.html (10,538 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Chet Moore" <Chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 21:28:53 -0400
consider buying k1zm's book on 160 you now have enough land to build every antenna in it. n4fx --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jorge Diez (CX6V
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00049.html (9,000 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:32:01 -0400
Wow! What a question to ask on this site. Gary, every member has an answer. Back as far as the 70's I asked that question of about 80 160 DXers world wide. I had more than 60 of them answer with diag
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00055.html (8,382 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:03:23 -0400
Really? Well established FACT? Im quite confused then as reading Johns book it seems quite nebulous the impact of elevated radials. Doesnt seem to be a fact more dependent on location and other varia
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00057.html (8,517 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:17:23 -0500
Maybe not. There has been more research done since I last read N6LF's writings, etc. The earth underneath must have something to do with it. In any case, the current has to be the same on all the rad
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00058.html (9,135 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:37:04 -0500
Next to last paragraph is what I had focused on before sending you an email last night. Seems there it is not cut and dried solution, maybe even some black magic, as opposed to an excellent ground sy
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00059.html (9,666 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: MICHAEL ST ANGELO <mstangelo@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:48:11 -0400 (EDT)
Have there been any professional studies done on the efficiency of elevated radials? One would think the broadcast industry would be interested in a few elevated radials instead of burying all that e
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00062.html (10,586 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:14:13 -0400
Question on the choke balun. I am using a Comtek 100 bead over RG-400 feedline choke on my shunt fed tower. Would there be a noticeable difference by replacing with a stack of ferrite cores and sever
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00064.html (10,020 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Best 160 antenna (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:36:07 -0500
In my opinion there wouldn't be a noticeable difference if you removed what you already have assuming you have a reasonably good radial system. Stan, K5GO _________________ Topband Reflector Archives
/archives//html/Topband/2017-08/msg00065.html (10,692 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu