Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverages\s+vs\s+4SQ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Beverages\s+vs\s+4SQ\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Beverages vs 4SQ (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT); Hello topbanders, I am planning my antenna farm for 160 and 80m and was wondering what your thoughts are on the above question. My VE3 property is large enough to fit several beverages, although the; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00156.html (6,567 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Beverages vs 4SQ (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:41:01 -0400; If you can put up both, go for it. I have 3 of the DX Engineering reversible beverages (each 580', covering NE, E, SE, SW, W, NW) and one of the DXE 4 squares (98'/side per their 80/160 compromise d; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00157.html (7,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]