Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Bizarre\s+conditions\s+10\/28\s+on\s+top\s+band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Bizarre\s+conditions\s+10\/28\s+on\s+top\s+band\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 06:51:32 +0800; G'day Dick, If Frank W3LPL can get up a 'low' dipole, preferably go for one around 0.25 of a wavelength high (or as high/close to this as possible). One lower than this is going to have more ground l; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00001.html (8,051 bytes)
2. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: kd9sv@tk7.net (gary nichols); Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 09:18:43 -0500; I have been normally able to work most stations on top band that are loud enough to hear on SSB without much difficulty, however last night was real strange. CN8WW was worked one call, while stations; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00162.html (8,048 bytes)
3. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@webtv.net (Thomas Giella); Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 05:45:26 -0400 (EDT); Thomas KN4LF Says: I worked CN8WW on phone with my puny 135 watts, he was very strong at 59+10 but I also heard many of the other Euro stations with no problem here in central Florida. The signals to; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00165.html (8,163 bytes)
4. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:45:27 -0500; Yup, I second that... I finally worked zone 33, but the opportunity came and went in seconds as they suddenly peaked... We did not have any real propagation on either 80 or 160 both nights... Friday; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00169.html (7,572 bytes)
5. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:44:18 -0500; I don't think conditions were so bizarre. It was a typical SSB contest, where everyone spends too much time calling and the QRM is the limiting factor. The band was open a long time, and seemed stabl; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00175.html (8,227 bytes)
6. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:11:56 -0500; I keep watching the A, K and SFI along with the Aurora numbers. Nothing ever seems to make sense. The days when I figure it isn't worth trying are often the best, many days when the A and K are low; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00177.html (9,054 bytes)
7. Topband: Bizarre conditions 10/28 on top band (score: 1): Author: dz@VOA.GOV (Richard Zwirko); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:20:52 -0500 (EST); Tom, Maybe the condx weren't too bizzare down south, but they sure were in MD at W3LPL. I've been operating in one of the Top Band positions at Frank's in DX contests since around '94 and can say tha; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00179.html (8,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]