Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Blatant\s+cheating\s+using\s+Remote\s+Operation\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:21:19 -0400
There is no way an organization such as the ARRL can prevent cheating in the DXCC program. It has to depend on the honesty of the hams involved. Yes..some people will cheat but I can't see how they c
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00071.html (7,651 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:34:48 -0400
Good for you Roger....you always hear about hams using remotes to work the dx, but they dont usually say much when the dx uses a remote to hear them.... Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00074.html (8,197 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:54:10 +1300
Guys need to be more discriminatory when discussing remote operation. I use a remote installation, and have for years, but I abide by the DXCC rules which state that the Tx and Rx antennas have to be
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00075.html (9,769 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:54:18 -0700
Greg, you, VU2GSM and others openly state how you are operating, and follow the accepted rules. And I'm glad you do. Those who do not and claim DXCC credit for a out of country remote credit should o
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00076.html (10,639 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Dave Clouser <dave@nz3m.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:39:14 -0400
My opinion, may not be popular. Note:  I'm not talking about hams remoting to _their own_ station.  That is what the great technology is meant for. A remote station to someone else s equipment is not
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00077.html (13,933 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 14:28:55 -0700
I'm of a like mind with FT-8 QSOs. I've broken down and make them because of a friendly club competition, and I put them on LoTW, but I don't count them for DXCC credit.  (No argument with those that
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00079.html (8,698 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:23:35 -0400
I've been saying this for years! It's pretty clear in the regs: § 97.119 Station identification. (a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned ca
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00080.html (15,703 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: "m.r.c." <mrc02@kinderteacher.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:09:40 -0700
this is a bit long, but I think explaining the hole in the rules and how they apply to us is worthwhile.. . All this means is that as a properly licensed operator, we may be the primary control opera
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00086.html (21,565 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: thorvaldur S T E F A N S S O N <otradalur@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 16:38:36 +0000
*b)* All transmitters and receivers comprising a station used for a specific contact must be located within a 500-meter diameter circle. Although it is a rather "strange" rule, it only mentions trans
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00095.html (11,288 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:50:04 -0500
I think the key word is Station which assumes that 500M diameter circle encompasses all aspects of the station to include feedlines and antennas. A transmitter and/or receiver are not a station witho
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00098.html (12,181 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 14:04:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cecil, Please think again. Many topbanders use antennas and feedlines that extend beyond a 500 meter diameter circle. Please don't disparage us. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Message -- From: "Cecil" <c
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00102.html (13,223 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:19:18 -0700
I think in Frank's case the WAS 50-mile rule applies. Wes  N7WS Please think again. Many topbanders use antennas and feedlines that extend beyond a 500 meter diameter circle. Please don't disparage u
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00103.html (9,577 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:27:43 -0500
Its not my intent to disparage anyone. Just an attempt to better define the intent of the rule as it relates to what a station is. Maybe if the feed point of those antennas are within the circle its
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00104.html (13,921 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: José E. Ribeiro de Sá <zemurtosa@mail.telepac.pt>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:46:12 -0500
Greg, For DXCC there's no such a 500m rule, you can operate your station (in New-Zealand) remotelly from Portugal as soon as you use your callsign ZL3IX, QSOs will count only for New-Zealand. Have a
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00112.html (12,604 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu