Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Blessed\s+With\s+Too\s+Many\s+Trees\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Willenberg <wewill747@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:02:34 -0500
I am very fortunate that my home is located on 5 acres of land in the country. This make for a very low noise environment. The problem I may have is my house is located on about 21/2 acres of landsca
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00631.html (7,810 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:12:57 -0800
Hi Wayne, My QTH in the Santa Cruz Mountains is in a very dense redwood forest, and I've tried to learn as much as I can about how they affect my antennas. I've operated all bands from 160M to 450 MH
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00000.html (9,134 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:16:53 -0500
...[snip]... A lot of this needs to be put onto a scale. To a cellphone guy, losing a TOTAL of 3 dB to trees would operationally NO loss. To a ham putting up an L next to a tree, and losing 3 dB, and
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00008.html (13,729 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 16:36:59 -0600
This is also the impression that I have. I've read countless experiences over the years that indicated that trees were no worry on HF. But then this thread came along. I have no other antenna to comp
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00014.html (7,813 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:10:36 -0500
I hope that I was clear that the sweet gums which had grown right up into the wire were the culprit. And that the 100' loblolly antenna tree seemed to be of little effect, other than its fortunate he
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00018.html (10,056 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees? (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:51:23 -0500
Ive personally seen the results of HF to 2M QRO (usually legal or close to it) on trees when concentrated by yagis that were barely above them. Id be there as a visitor or doing tower/antenna work an
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00019.html (9,774 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu