Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Brave\s+New\s+World\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Brave\s+New\s+World\s*$/: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Glenn Anderson <wb5tuf@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:48:10 -0600; None taken...my K3 ' s are enough. No offense but I suggest you get some more exciting radio equipment to run. 73 Rob K5UJ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_to; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00675.html (8,658 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:49:28 -0800; Have you ever visited a multi-transmitter contesting station? Do you have any idea of the engineering it took to build it and make it competitive? We're talking antenna system design, careful enginee; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00676.html (10,910 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:54:03 -0600; I'm calling BS on that one. Tune across the CW bands at night. Very little activity compared to 30 or 40 years ago. Of course, I define CW activity as being real CW operating, i.e. ragchewing, handl; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00677.html (9,296 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Charlie <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:41:04 -0600; Technological advances have consequences. With remote operation, most of the consequences are positive. These positive consequences have been well stated. There are also some negative consequences. O; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00678.html (16,776 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:47:22 -0500; Well, I *don't* understand why people are upset about this. The K4VV crowd operated a station in Virginia that had all it's antennas and all the RX and all the TX on one local property. They reported; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00679.html (15,022 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:53:12 -0800; On Thu,2/26/2015 10:41 AM, Charlie wrote: The serious DX chasers, especially Topband, are faced with a dilemma now. Anyone who wants to pay the $$ can be at the head of the line for a rare one by rem; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00680.html (10,636 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:56:03 -0700; Yes! Mike W0MU On 2/26/2015 10:49 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On Thu,2/26/2015 7:29 AM, kolson@rcn.com wrote: Sometimes it's more in how things are presented. The thing that struck me was how the ARRL looke; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00681.html (11,090 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:08:55 -0700; Except it is not an ABUSE of the rules. People feel that it is an abuse but it is fully sanctioned by the ARRL. If people want to pay to use a station in NY that is their choice. How does that choice; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00682.html (12,539 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:14:09 -0700; _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00683.html (9,959 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:18:16 -0500; There used to be list takers for DX stations, too, as I recall--and I can remember proficient DX'ers likening such a practice to "...shooting fish in a barrel." ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __________; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00684.html (10,140 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:59:41 -0500 (EST); Actually Jim old boy, I have. I have been a Frankford RC member for 43 years and have operated from many M/M and M/S stations both in the US and as DX. I have a good idea what goes into it and have h; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00687.html (11,191 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Charlie <weeksmgr@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:16:19 -0600; Mike, the difference is that on the DX Net, everyone was not using the same transmitter and receiver. I am not trying to protect my superior location from competition. It is on a rock cliff directly; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00688.html (11,268 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:22:53 -0800; On Thu,2/26/2015 11:59 AM, kolson@rcn.com wrote: What's sad in my view, is that in my M/M and M/S experiences, one of the greatest parts was getting together with the ops I was friends with that, due; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00689.html (9,178 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: "Dave Blaschke, w5un" <w5un@wt.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 20:57:45 +0000; On second thought, I retract my original objection; K4VV not being a RHR for money deal. Dave The K4VV crowd operated a station in Virginia that had all it's antennas and all the RX and all the TX on; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00690.html (15,816 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Keller (K3BZ)" <k3bz@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:56:34 -0500; This wouldn't be much of a problem if the callsign goes with the station, not the operator. The list operations were indeed like "shooting fish in a barrel", but at least (it seemed like) everyone us; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00733.html (11,530 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 55
Page: [1] [2] [3]