Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Buffaloed\s+by\s+a\s+bias\s+tee\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:32:24 -0500
I'm still wrestling with the bias tee for my 1-of-8 remote beverage switch. If I use a cliplead to connect a 270-ohm dummy load, bypassing the relay, and connect an MFJ-259B to the receiver port on t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00192.html (7,786 bytes)

2. Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:20:15 -0500
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions - consensus seems to be that the homebrew chokes are not enough reactance at 1.8 MHz, so I'll get some store bought ones at 220 uH or more. I tried battery po
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00194.html (7,671 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:34:22 -0500
The quickest way to blow up any test equipment, from a MFJ259 up to an HP network analyzer, is to use a bias T without input safeguards on the test gear. :-) I'm still wrestling with the bias tee for
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00195.html (10,202 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:45:35 -0500
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions - consensus seems to be that the homebrew chokes are not enough reactance at 1.8 MHz, so I'll get some store bought ones at 220 uH or more. I tried battery po
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00196.html (8,697 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:52:03 -0800
On 1/22/2014 12:32 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: . However, as soon as I connect a 12V regulated supply to the bias tee - one of the little radio shack variable wallwarts - the measured R drops to 5 ohm
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00197.html (8,170 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:15:40 -0700
This is really not rocket science--it's a simple matter of knowing what you are doing. Please contact me off line. After doing this for 40+ years I have had more than a modicum of sucess........ Hard
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00198.html (8,525 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 21:56:31 -0600
73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00199.html (7,810 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:11:55 -0800
73, Mike www.w0btu.com Rick N6RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00201.html (8,248 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:07:56 -0500
Hi. Well, it does indeed seem to clinch it - when I power the tee but don't draw any current, the impedance measured by the MFJ does not change. So now to find some of the right sort of RFC. 73, Pete
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00204.html (9,783 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:27:21 -0600
Here are the RFC part numbers, from http://www.ad5x.com/images/Articles/BiasT3amp.pdf "I finally settled on two J.W. Miller inductors that appeared acceptable. One was the 5250-RC 100 uHy inductor ra
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00205.html (8,536 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:03:12 -0500
Hi Pete, You are going to have to trust me on this one. You really should **NOT** be measuring the input of the bias T with the MFJ 259 B analyzer with the configuration you have. You can damage the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00206.html (13,125 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:45:29 -0500
Tom, I appreciate your concern. I have made these changes - I am now using a shunt choke (homebrew,, measuring 45 uH) and a smaller series capacitor.. Now all I have to do is to find a source of some
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00207.html (14,158 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:15:56 -0800
capacitor.. Now all I have to do is to find a source of some appropriate chokes for the final tee, and my problems may be behind me. I was just looking at some Hammond chokes, no. 1532h - 100 uH, ra
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00208.html (9,843 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:18:20 -0500
The Hammond is 400 mA and probably OK, I never used one. I use something like these 100 uH from Mouser Electronics: 542-73F104AF-RC or depending on current 542-5250-RC -- Original Message -- From: "P
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00210.html (15,649 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:23:29 -0500
That gives only a 509 Ohm reactance at 1800 Pete. Going to an oft suggested 100uH raises that to 1131 which is possibly sufficient. I use 220uH for a 2488 XL simply because I have a bunch from a hamf
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00215.html (11,086 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Buffaloed by a bias tee (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schonbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:32:42 -0400
Mini Circuits makes a bias Tee box that has very low insertion loss down to 500Khz. It is their model*ZX85-12G-S*. and as Tom pointed out there is a change with current throughput and you can view th
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00219.html (16,857 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu