Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Butternut\s+HF2V\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Butternut\s+HF2V\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Butternut HF2V (score: 1): Author: "Osten B Magnusson" <sm5dqc@areteadsl.se>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:02:23 +0100; Dear friends! Someone wrote today that he is using a modified Butternut HF2V on 160, but I did delete that message by mistake. If you read this, what modifications did you make? Thanks in advance for; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00000.html (6,556 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Butternut HF2V (score: 1): Author: "Osten B Magnusson" <sm5dqc@areteadsl.se>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:20:11 +0100; Thanks!!! I received a lot of answers regarding HF2V modified for 160 meters - my conclusion is that this antenna is not what is needed for DX on top-band. I will try to find a solution for my small; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00021.html (7,275 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Butternut HF2V (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:54:30 +0000; The HF2V works as well as can be expected for a short vertical with base loading. If on the ground, you really need a decent radial system. Ground clutter also takes a bite out of things. Get it up o; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00029.html (7,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]