Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CAT5\s+cable\s+as\s+feeder\s+for\s+reversable\s+Beverage\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: "Arunas LY2IJ" <ly2ij@qrz.lt>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:38:14 +0300 (EEST)
Hi, Is it worth trying to use outdoor CAT5 to feed reversible Beverage? There are 4 twisted pairs inside, paralleling 2 for both directions will give something close to 50 or 75 ohms. Any idea what i
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00027.html (6,720 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:02:42 -0400
As a feedline, as in any "twisted pair" like old phone line was called, CAT-5 has been successfully used as a feed line for RF. There is no reason it should not perform any worse than 200-300 ohm rib
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00028.html (8,494 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Wichers" <billw@waveform.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:40 -0400
There is a test used when installing this cable commercially called "PowerSum NEXT". If you look that up you should be able to get an idea of the coupling between pairs. If I remember correctly it's
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00029.html (8,024 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:09:26 -0700
These are most likely to be single-number values that average the crosstalk over a broad frequency range, but the actual performance will vary as a function of frequency, and with the quality of the
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00030.html (8,820 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:36:53 -0400
FWIW, I have several runs of outdoor-rated CAT-5 cable to and from my tower. It is flooded and has a tough jacket to help stave off the chipmunks. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, up
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00032.html (9,009 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:25:04 -0400
Ive run indoor CAT-5 about 250' to a remote building where a PC is located. It is elevated about 8', hung from the CATV hardline and control cable bundle, and has been in use about 12 years, about 10
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00034.html (10,189 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:04:59 -0500
the primary consideration is probably what Herb noted about I fully agree. I have a 300'+ outdoor run of CAT6 on my LAN. The portion which is not in conduit is seriously deteriorating from the sun's
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00035.html (9,114 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: CAT5 cable as feeder for reversable Beverage (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Wichers" <billw@waveform.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:31:34 -0400
You are likely correct. I have not reviewed the spec in some time, but it most likely is an average value over the LAN-used spectral range (likely in the high-kHz region up to maybe 100MHz or so). It
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00038.html (10,973 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu