Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CONTEST\s+OBSERVATION\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CONTEST\s+OBSERVATION\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION (score: 1): Author: "Mr. and Mrs. Magoo" <magoo@isp.ca>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:41:05 -0500; Great conditions, great contest, made all the more enjoyable by those KW operators who have fixed their key click problems since last time! As always, running 100 watts in the contest, I found myself; /archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00342.html (7,207 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:31:06 -0800; few lot When I inquired prior to the CQ 160 contest about the click performance of the FT-847 it got mixed reviews. Since I didn't really have time to find a better rig in the short time available,; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00004.html (7,726 bytes)
3. Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:33:19 -0500; W4EF: is not a contest grade receiver (not even close). The one I used suffered from horrendous filter blowby and all kinds of phantom signals. It's works fine for casual operating, but it doesn't re; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00011.html (7,868 bytes)
4. RE: Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:49:13 -0600; I'll second that, Had to use the 857D last weekend also as my orion was in for a check up, Agree with everything said, For going on a trip or mobile, just fine, (which is what I use it for), for cont; /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00019.html (7,276 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]