Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+160\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:31:03 -0500; This reminds me of a humorous incident which I am sure has happened to others: Someone wrote to me privately: No, both you and the DX station have every right to that frequency. Where it gets interes; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00429.html (7,905 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:17:21 -0500; None of us really don't know if the two stations or more stations sharing a frequency actually hear each other. We sat for hours sharing a frequency with Eu stations CQing underneath us and after th; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00431.html (8,275 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@uninets.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:50:42 -0500; "We just have to live with being fiends on Sunday and being friends on Monday." And we are just an "R" away from either <8^) so a little understanding is in order. 73 ________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00434.html (7,240 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Don Kerouac" <k9nr@daca.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:03:19 -0600; Depending on your point of view, I could have been a model for the bad boy club over the weekend. This year I was stuck with receiving on my transmit antenna. As a radiator, it works well (shunt fed,; /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00000.html (8,019 bytes)
5. Topband: cq 160 (score: 1): Author: james soto <kp2bh@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:38:06 -0800 (PST); Been testing the inverted L that i install few weeks ago.last night work couple caribbean stations and also few north american .band been pretty noisy at this end.but this morning was less noisy. wor; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00023.html (6,435 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: cq 160 (score: 1): Author: Sam Morgan <k5oai.sam@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:09:17 -0600; I run into that problem "they just keep calling without space between cq's." often myself. My guesses are, they are either not even listening, just trying to keep their claim to that frequency by the; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00024.html (8,301 bytes)
7. Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Jim - WS6X" <ws6x.ars@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 17:51:29 -0500; Gracious! I almost feel like I should apologize for sharing my 74-year old, "youthful" exuberance for having the weekend of my career on TB! To put things into perspective... 1. Since this is my 5th; /archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00170.html (7,675 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:12:43 -0400; GE Jim, We can't possibly all remember 'who is located where' in the lower 48. For Canadians, we are locked to our call areas, so if you were to work a VE9 (for example) on 160m, you can be relativel; /archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00171.html (9,227 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Jeff Kincaid <w6jk@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 01:21:03 +0000 (UTC); Those call sign mis-copies can be frustrating. I worked RI once (and only once, on TB), but couldn't convince the poor OM he hadn't snagged Peru. OA6BIL indeed! Missed it by _that_ much. Jeff W6JK; /archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00172.html (9,475 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:16:34 -0800; <I struggled to work a W8 on Topband this weekend (who I'd worked quite a few <times before) and <he could just NOT get my suffix. VE9AT, VE9A? , VE9TT, VE9?A, VE9MT, VE9MMT, <VE9AAT, etc. <Mike VE9; /archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00175.html (7,078 bytes)
11. Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:17:58 -0500; I haven't been on much at all for the last 6 months or so. Had a lot of physical issues, difficult getting around and antenna problems & nobody to help fix them. Better now, most of the antenna issue; /archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00230.html (6,602 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 07:15:20 -0500; Here in the south ( Florida) much the same propagation.. A few really strong stations from EU ( one UA2F that was so strong as to be suspicious) . The best EU signals were nearer their sunrise. Earli; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00001.html (7,899 bytes)
13. Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: <ws6x.ars@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:55:05 -0500; Thanks to all for the Qs this weekend. This was a good contest weekend for me. I did far better than ever before. My personal best for one night in a 160 contest was 34 EU stations worked; 57 for the; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00002.html (7,025 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:22:51 -0700; I noticed that too. NE, KS, SD, ND all missing. No one on or do we have a skip zone? Wes N7WS _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00003.html (7,165 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Sam Josuweit" <samjos@epix.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:19:44 -0500; I got NE and KS from PA. Also ID and MT. No Dakota's. Spotty propagation to Europe a few SA's, no Pacific/Asia. Sam(N3XZ) I noticed that too. NE, KS, SD, ND all missing. No one on or do we have a ski; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00006.html (8,085 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Mpridesti via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:35:24 -0500; Wes thanks for our Q Worked at least 2 NE, 2 SD, 4 KS, and 1 ND stations so they were there! Heard one VE4 and no VE5. Signals from that area were weak (spotlight). The joy and excitement of top band; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00007.html (8,133 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:52:07 -0500; The only one I missed was ND....only Canadians missed were lab and NWT/hi Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00008.html (8,370 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:23:17 -0700; Thank you as well. I am not a contester and I'm also not the greatest CW op. So I get on only sporadically and search and pounce, mostly looking for DX. I made all of 145 Qs. I used N3FJP's loggin; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00009.html (8,934 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:18:45 -0800; I worked 3 of those in the first 1/2 hour. Only missed NE. Rick N6RK Wes N7WS _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________ Searchab; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00010.html (8,162 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:49:19 -0600; Not sure about the other KS stations. But here in NW KS, if I don't spin the HiZ RX circle 8 around to point to SW, I just won't hear AZ unless the station calling is really strong or the prop is pe; /archives//html/Topband/2021-02/msg00011.html (10,184 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]