Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CQ\s+160\s+CW\s+Contest\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Wilson <jjw5257@yahoo.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:35:10 -0800 (PST)
First post to the group. Had to defend my title as last years winner for W/VE QRP, so I had to miss most of the DX-fest. So I spent 30 hours in the chair and improved my score by 25,000 points (112,0
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00282.html (8,655 bytes)

2. Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:51:53 -0800
Just a reminder that the biggest 160 meter contest is coming up this weekend. It starts at 2200 UTC on Friday and runs for 48 hours. Full rules can be found at http://www.cq160.com/. Exchange is RST
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00674.html (6,823 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:27:28 -0300
Hello, Just reading the rules, don`t like this, how they can control it? A new rule is added to allow the use of one and only one remote receiver located within 100KM of the main transmitter site. We
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00678.html (8,671 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:20 -0500
I feel those competing for the top scores, would need multiple remote receivers (not allowed by the rules) and would suffer from latency. What this does do, is allow some limited operation with a sin
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00679.html (9,871 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:37:47 -0500
Jorge, this new rule is for SINGLE OPERATOR ASSISTED ONLY. Multi ops, single ops are not allowed to use remote rx. For those of you that did not follow the thread, this was in response to some statio
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00680.html (10,590 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:41:18 -0500
This came up last year, and I pointed out it is a game changer. A station can now operate full duplex by having a remote receiving site. A few folks indicated they came close to being able to do this
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00681.html (9,621 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:41:12 +0000 (UTC)
Andy, It is not clear to me; can a low Power or QRP operator use a remote rx within 100km? Mike N2MS Jorge, this new rule is for SINGLE OPERATOR ASSISTED ONLY. Multi ops, single ops are not allowed t
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00682.html (11,377 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:45:59 -0300
I think assisted is only for High Power so the use of remote rx within 100km is for High power (D)Single Operator Assisted: HIGH POWER ONLY. Same as (A) with the following exceptions: The use of pass
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00683.html (12,749 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:44:51 -0500
Hi Mike. To clarify; The rule for allowing remote receivers is for Single Op ASSISTED only. It does not matter what power level you use. Multi Ops CANNOT use remote receivers. Single operator Unassis
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00684.html (12,912 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 16:02:56 -0600
Can someone tell me how this rule is going to be policed? Operator ethics (becoming an oxymoron) doesn't count. Doug/VE5RA I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could. --Original
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00685.html (13,974 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:06:46 -0800
This thread is getting dangerously close to being totally irrelevant to the mission of this reflector. There are MANY contest rules that can't be enforced. This is just making it clear what the inten
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00686.html (15,673 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:25:42 -0500
For me, I don't personally care at all. I often win CT or division as high scoring in most anything I enter but I'll never be in the top dog category. This change might impact some very dedicated con
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00687.html (11,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu