Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Comments\s+on\s+R4C\s+from\s+Sherwood\s+Engineering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Comments\s+on\s+R4C\s+from\s+Sherwood\s+Engineering\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Comments on R4C from Sherwood Engineering (score: 1): Author: w8ji@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:48:46 -0500; The R4C suffers two major problems: That's one. The other is the silly injection scheme where a 50 kHz oscillator (an oscillator well below the first and second IF frequencies) is injected into a mix; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00017.html (8,006 bytes)
2. Topband: Comments on R4C from Sherwood Engineering (score: 1): Author: crg8ibq@rmi.net (Curt Gamble); Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 23:45:51 -0800; I forwarded Art's comments to Rob Sherwood of Sherwood Engineering. Rob has replied to several points that were made. Curt K8IBQ Durango, CO. I think you'll be happier with the 775. The R4C has relat; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00230.html (10,691 bytes)
3. Topband: Comments on R4C from Sherwood Engineering (score: 1): Author: kolson@erols.com (Kevin Olson); Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:46:51 -0500; Aahh...R4C...brings back memories! Back in the day, a Sherwood-modified R4C ruled! I was jut a kid with no money but lotsa nerve, so I was determined to improve my R4C despite not being able to affor; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00238.html (8,797 bytes)
4. Topband: Comments on R4C from Sherwood Engineering (score: 1): Author: k6xt@arrl.net (Art Charette); Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:19:20 -0800; Rob makes some excellent points, which I've left in this reply. Tnx to K8IBQ. I'm off to the website to see if my 781 is listed. Had a good time last eve for the 3 hours or so I could operate in the; /archives//html/Topband/2000-01/msg00247.html (10,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]