Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Conditions\s+last\s+night\s+\-\s+operating\s+manners\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Conditions\s+last\s+night\s+\-\s+operating\s+manners\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Conditions last night - operating manners (score: 1): Author: "Ivo Pezer" <9a3a@libero.it>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:46:41 +0100; I fully agree with Steve's comment - tail end, although I rarely use it, is one of the most beautiful pile-up experience, if used (not abused) on both ends, so it should be used only in such cases wh; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00222.html (11,284 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Conditions last night - operating manners (score: 1): Author: Earl W Cunningham <k6se@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:43:08 -0800; I think this thread started when someone commented about tailenders not "waiting in line". I hope he was referring to "list" and "by call area" operations because otherwise there is no "line" to wait; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00230.html (7,412 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Conditions last night - operating manners (score: 1): Author: "Don K5AQ" <donhall@myriad.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:57:49 -0600; Earl, I agree with you about their being no "line" to wait in. A pileup is just that, a pileup. I think Larry LeKashman, W2IOP(SK) described it best in his book "CQ DX" back in about 1949: "You have; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00233.html (7,713 bytes)
4. RE: Topband: Conditions last night - operating manners (score: 1): Author: "Gary Nichols" <kd9sv@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:03:28 -0500; There almost always seems to be a "pecking order" in terms of a great pile-up and who gets through followed by who etc etc. I have learned that normally Wally, Tom, Bill, Jeff and quite a number of o; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00235.html (9,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]