Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Contest\s+in\s+progress\s+\-\s+few\s+signals\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:19:56 -0500
If I am operating ARRL DX contest at home I just work the handful of no-mult-no-point domestic guys to get them out of the way. Out of 2000+ QSO's, only two such cases this year, better than some pre
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00308.html (10,169 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:57:36 -0600
The last thing I would want is a pile up of USA calling me when I am listening for a weak DX signal. Answering one only encourages others to call. Ignoring them is not being rude or nasty. Doug "Thin
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00309.html (9,806 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Jim Bennett <w6jhb@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:46:27 -0800
I'd like to add my .02 to this thread, as an observer. There certainly are two sides to the story. The folks running "big gun" stations on top band in the contest are out there trying to garner point
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00310.html (9,876 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:06:05 -0600
I appreciate all the replies and helpful advice. Since there will always be some that won't study the official rules (I promise I will from now on :-), here's what I think is the best solution. When
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00311.html (9,591 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Andrew AC6WI <ac6wi@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:04:34 -0500
Hi all, As the person who did the majority of the running (and I use that word loosely given the conditions) on 160m at W3LPL this weekend, I think some explanation is in order. I did work a number o
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00312.html (11,967 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:25:00 -0800 (PST)
This doesn't apply to the contest this past weekend, but each year in CQWW I am very grateful to the Zone 2 VE who answers my call even though he will get no points for the contact. 73 Roger VE3ZI __
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00313.html (8,321 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:59:45 -0600
I tried sending in slow cw 'only dx'. It didn't make any difference ... they still kept calling. Early in the contest I did log a few ... but after a while it became irritating. My logging program co
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00314.html (11,265 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:01:45 -0500
I was the topband operator at K3LR this weekend (loved every minute) and I echo Andrew's (at W3LPL) comments below - with the directive receive arrays it takes both of us a few seconds to find out wh
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00315.html (13,938 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Contest in progress - few signals (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:41:47 -0600
I am not picking on any one operator. But guys think about it. If you all start/continue working 0 point NA stations ... do you not think that it encourages these stations to continue this behaviour?
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00316.html (9,524 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu