Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Current\s+Distribution\s+on\s+Buried\s+Radials\s+Used\s+With\s+Vertical\s+Monopoles\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 04:55:28 -0600
For discussion... http://s20.postimg.org/kq2k6pox9/Current_Distr_on_Buried_Radials.jpg R. Fry _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00041.html (6,841 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: Eduardo Araujo via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 21:57:30 +0000 (UTC)
Hello Richard, and all Topbanders, I am not going to discuss the accuracy of what Brown, Epstein and Lewis found, only I am just curious about one thing.. Everytime I measured my radials with a curre
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00042.html (8,821 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 20:44:36 -0400
The Brown, Lewis and Epstein study (BL&E) was most likely done over very uniform, and over pretty good dirt for RF. I would trust your measurements as far more typical of ham circumstances. A few yea
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00043.html (10,950 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: D Rodman MD <rodman@buffalo.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:18:45 -0400
Heading back to the states in a few minutes. Quickly, wondering if one could measure antenna currents in the vertical portion of antenna with a pickup loop at various heights and compare with measuri
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00045.html (7,078 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: Eduardo Araujo via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
"A specific description from you about the ground used for radials would be very interesting. 73, Guy K2AV" Guy and all,                   Unfortunately the only data about terrain is almost flat far
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00046.html (10,199 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:22:40 -0400
"Laying on the ground" could mean anything from laying directly on dirt to top of the grass 5 cm above the dirt. That is a wide swing in VF. 73, Guy K2AV _________________ Topband Reflector Archives
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00047.html (10,761 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Current Distribution on Buried Radials Used With Vertical Monopoles (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:38:44 -0700
Yes, and as W8JI has observed more than once, skin depth at 160M can be tens of meters, and in many locations is probably a variable. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http:
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00048.html (8,726 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu