Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DXCC\s+Committe\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DXCC\s+Committe\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:17:45 +0100; Hi, Above all, to all of us previously born solid health during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Let me show you how one can be easily kicked out from 1 position in spite of meeting all the compe; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00261.html (13,757 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:37:42 -0300; OK, so let me get this straight. You sent the DXCC desk a Doctored card, got busted, then claimed you didn't send it (you just wanted them to admire your skills?), got kicked out of the DXCC program; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00262.html (6,939 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:01:05 +0200; Hi You are a very strange man Jarda... You wanted to have 349 countries and provided a fake card .. There is a wise Russian proverb - "greed killed the fraer" Maybe I translated badly. In Russian : "; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00263.html (8,130 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: pa5mw--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:05:45 +0100; OK, so let me get this straight: You sent the DXCC desk a Doctored card ==> *check* (that was clearly explained up front) got busted ==> negative contribution (that is the 'fact' needing to be peer-r; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00264.html (9,617 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:13:14 -0300; I'm not sure what your beef is with me , Mark/PA5MW. All I did was summarize his emails and brought no extra facts, opinions or innuendo's into play. I jumped to no conclusions. I asked a question at; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00265.html (10,313 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: pa5mw--- via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:23:18 +0100; Hi Mike Please forgive my blunt words, but It's about your tone what is bothering me. I see that all too often happening on this list. You are the first one responding here on his message. Surely one; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00266.html (11,146 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:33:55 -0300; No worries Mark. Dank u vel. Perhaps I have interpreted his facts (as presented) incorrectly. I do not know. That's why I prefaced my initial message with: "... OK, so let me get this straight:..." (; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00267.html (12,039 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: "m.r.c." <mrc02@kinderteacher.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:15:16 -0700; M A Y B E this started out on topic about topband My delete key is getting annoyed. How about take the DXCC desk practices discussion - and the language lessons - elsewhere Robin WA6CDR No worries Ma; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00268.html (8,268 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: K9FD <merv.k9fd@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:27:01 -1000; Well let me be the 2nd then to comment, His gripe is he was just sending it to "test" them to check it out, didnt really mean to submit it, If they would have just passed it through and given credit; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00270.html (12,556 bytes)
10. Topband: DXCC committe (score: 1): Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:49:14 +0100; O.K. guys. watching the discussion about " my matter " and let me specify that material QSL is exactly same as I have from other band it means there is a label over clean basic QSL confirmed over by; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00271.html (7,771 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: DXCC committe (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:12:16 -0600; Why don't you take photos of all your Jarvis card close up so we can see for ourselves. How could you have received a card for a contact that does not appear in their log. To you have the Jarvis lo; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00272.html (9,253 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: DXCC committe (score: 1): Author: w5zn@w5zn.org; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:52:42 -0600; Jarda, As I understand the email string you submitted to this list, a card confirmation you submitted was in question so the DXCC desk checked the DXPedition's log, which they have a copy of, and you; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00274.html (8,323 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:35:10 -0700; Based upon the supplied communications, it's unclear to me whether there was an actual application made along with the submitted card or not. Jarda claims not, but based on the disqualification, if; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00275.html (9,850 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:04:40 +0200; Wes You want to say that such a tricky way (presenting a fake card without an application) should go unpunished? -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Wes 2020-03-23 19:35: Based upon the supplied; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00276.html (10,956 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: uy0zg <uy0zg@mksat.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:05:32 +0200; Wes You want to say that such a tricky way (presenting a fake card without an application) should go unpunished? -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Wes 2020-03-23 19:35: Based upon the supplied; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00277.html (10,919 bytes)
16. Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:11:15 -0400; opinion about the card. Why was an opinion needed? It was a DXCC accepted activation, was it not? Perhaps paper confirmation should no longer be accepted. Yes, collusion can easy beat any LoTW secur; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00278.html (7,745 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:43:30 -0400; FYI: http://g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00279.html (7,726 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:12:39 -0300; Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu <mailto:btippett%40alum.mit.edu> > FYI: http://g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html _________________ wow..just wow...no other words are needed. wow _________; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00281.html (7,912 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: Ken Claerbout <kenk4zw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:43:45 -0400; I don't wish to drag this debate out any longer than necessary, but some credit is due the League and the DXCC desk. I was contacted some time back asking for a section of one of my DX logs. I gave t; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00285.html (8,774 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:15:11 -0600; Wow! The guy should have been DQed ages ago. http://g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector __________; /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00289.html (8,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]