Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Delta\s+loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Delta\s+loop\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (Phil - KB9CRY); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:49:05 -0500; Here's a batch of new piks of my latest experiment. Rotatable Delta Loop for receiving on 160M and 80M. Measures 17 ft. tall by 28 ft. long. All home brew, designed by K6SE, fiberglass poles by Max-G; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00103.html (7,392 bytes)
2. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@attbi.com (Phil - KB9CRY); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:04:17 -0500; Oops, forgot you can't send attachments to the reflector. Sri. I'll repost this when the local club posts them on the club website. Let me know if anyone wants me to send the piks (about 7 in total); /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00104.html (8,429 bytes)
3. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (KN4LF, Thomas Giella); Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 22:12:09 -0500; I put up what I call a squashed delta loop in Colorado in 1994 and it worked just fantastic. I put the base of the antenna 10 feet above ground, and the apex at 100 feet above ground. Using the formu; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00038.html (7,967 bytes)
4. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 11:51:12 +0000; I put up what I call a squashed delta loop in Colorado in 1994 and it worked just fantastic. I put the base of the antenna 10 feet above ground, and the apex at 100 feet above ground. Using the formu; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00039.html (9,085 bytes)
5. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:55:35 +0000; I have heard these arguments before about delta loops on the low bands (one of my DXing buddies at work keeps telling me the same thing about our 75M delta loop), but aren't we forgetting that you do; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00041.html (7,790 bytes)
6. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:29:20 +0000; efficiency. I agree completely...but that does not mean an elevated GP or a Delta loop will not work. Improving the ground under any vertically polarized antenna is ALWAYS a good idea. A Delta loop c; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00042.html (7,976 bytes)
7. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: r.c.eldridge@ieee.org (Bob Eldridge ); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 11:17:58 -0800; For some reason the loop does not reradiate noise as much as grounded verticals do. It doesn't function better than a phased array (or indeed as well) for transmitting, but it is easier to install a; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00043.html (8,687 bytes)
8. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: fkamp@home.com (fkamp@home.com); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 15:46:27 -0600; I think you are both missing the point of using the delta loop. It is used because it offers decent performance without an extensive ground screen. If an extensive ground screen could be had, a simpl; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00045.html (8,113 bytes)
9. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: kn4lf@tampabay.rr.com (KN4LF, Thomas Giella); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 16:57:06 -0500; Bob VE7BS made some very valid points in his previous email. We all get to hung up on lot's of radials near the feedpoint of a vertical antenna. They are certainly needed in the near field of a 1/4 w; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00046.html (8,608 bytes)
10. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:00:20 -0500; Hi All, There certainly isn't any free lunch with antennas, and we always have limitations or tradeoffs on what we can do compared to ideal situations. The problem with comparisons is we often compar; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00047.html (11,885 bytes)
11. Topband: Delta Loop (score: 1): Author: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herbert Schoenbohm); Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:05:44 -0400; The important consideration in my view is that the Delta Loop allows you to get up and running with a fair performing 160 or 80 meter antenna without much effort. However according to the original te; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00049.html (8,704 bytes)
12. Topband: Delta loop (score: 1): Author: "Bruce" <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:17:38 -0800; Charlie, I think you must have missed my original posting. The smaller receiving Delta loop optimized for 160 meters is by Earl K6SE (sk) and is a K6SE paper is posting on eham.. http://www.eham.net/; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00544.html (6,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]