- 1. Topband: Elevated Radials - W5UN's take (score: 1)
- Author: W5UN <w5un@wt.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:16:44 +0000
- I really did not plan to respond to this thread, but after seeing Charlies' comments, I thought I should share my experiences, as they may be of help to others here. In 2004 I constructed a 1/4 wl 80
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00046.html (9,347 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials - W5UN's take (score: 1)
- Author: k3bu@optonline.net
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:16:33 -0400
- radials per antenna, and these are 20 feet high and parallel to the ground. John, ON4UN, claims I now have a great dummy load on 160, hi. But its working for me. Soil conditions undoubtedly have some
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00052.html (9,134 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials - W5UN's take (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:15:18 -0400
- I wonder how can that be? Everything known to man shows that with around 50 or 60 1/4 wave radials over any type of soil a system is out at the very top of efficiency curves. Any Marconi vertical sy
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00063.html (7,850 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu