Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FCP\s+Folded\s+Counterpoise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FCP\s+Folded\s+Counterpoise\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Jim F." <j_fitton@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:54:36 -0700 (PDT); It is amazing that a 66' long counterpoise can be effective on 160m. I put one in the woods at this condo location in NH yesterday and heard an SM, G6 and W9 and W0 stations on it last night and th; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00230.html (6,836 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:54:08 -0500; What is the useful SWR bandwidth without retuning? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00231.html (6,618 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: DGB <ns9i2016@bayland.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:47:14 -0500; Mines abt. 20 khz from the lower end. My KPA500 takes care of it all just fine. 73 Dwight NS9I 73, Mike www.w0btu.com It is amazing that a 66' long counterpoise can be effective on 160m. ... the SWR; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00233.html (7,441 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:01:46 -0500; Thanks, but I realized that. I was just curious, because somewhere I read that the FCP had a slightly narrower bandwidth than a couple of elevated radials. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com Mike, The wider the; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00238.html (8,398 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:56:32 -0400; Thanks, but I realized that. I was just curious, because somewhere I read that the FCP had a slightly narrower bandwidth than a couple of elevated radials. Mike, The wider the bandwidth the less effe; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00239.html (8,867 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:15:06 -0500; I think I see why you said what you did, Tom. If we replace the two elevated radials under our inverted-L with an FCP, and the bandwidth gets a little narrower, then yes, that doesn't prove that we'v; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00240.html (10,074 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Jim Bennett <w6jhb@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:20:34 -0700; Mike - FWIW - I had a two tuned-radial 80 meter Inverted L hung in one of our redwood trees. Replaced it with an FCP and my bandwidth was almost the same. Quite happy with the FCP at this QTH. We are; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00241.html (9,406 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:47:52 -0400; We should get the idea "less BW indicates more efficiency" out of our minds. I think I see why you said what you did, Tom. If we replace the two elevated radials under our inverted-L with an FCP, and; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00242.html (11,072 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: FCP Folded Counterpoise (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:52:56 -0500; Thanks, Jim. One thing seems certain, and that's that K2AV's FCP is plenty efficient enough to allow hams with HOAs or limited space to get on 160 with a really good signal. The FCP is on my long lis; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00243.html (9,010 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]