Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+FCP\s+vs\s+Gull\s+Wing\s+Elevated\s+Radials\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:04:33 -0400
This kind of goes with the other thread that has morphed into the FCP topic, but is a bit different. With an FCP feeding the INV-L, the bottom of the INV-L will be at least 10 feet off the ground. Wi
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00087.html (7,266 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Mark, I suspect the current -- and hence the radiation -- from the bottom of the vertical radiator is somewhat suppressed by proximity to gull wing radials. When I first installed a 160 vertical u
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00089.html (8,382 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:01:06 -0700
Personally, I would and do, avoid a FCP antenna.  W8JI has done some analysis on these and I value his insight. http://www.w8ji.com/fcp_folded_counterpoise_system.htm There is simply too much handwav
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00092.html (10,041 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:37:27 -0700
As to gull wing radials, Rudy Severns has looked at these too: https://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/files/antenna_ground_system_experiment_5.pdf Rudy's work is a treasure trove and I think I have everythin
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00093.html (8,785 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:38:20 -0500
Hi Wes, I have also always had the highest regard for 99.9% of anything that W8JI has stated. However, I feel exactly the same way about K2AV (and, of course, Rudy too). In this particular case, I am
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00094.html (11,189 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:10:18 -0700
I guess I should have added "useful to me."  At my location, I wouldn't dream of having elevated radials less than 6 feet above ground.  Running them through the cactus and bushes could be just as di
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00096.html (12,829 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Chortek, Robert L." <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:21:20 +0000
I am going to add what may be a meaningless post to this thread. I live on a 1/4 acre lot in the black hole of San Jose California. Until very recently I was using a base loaded 1/8 wave vertical for
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00097.html (8,908 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:43:42 -0400
Hi Wes, Thanks for posting up the Severns material. I had started looking for that, but without memory of exact words (which makes searching difficult), and without absolute certainty that Rudy was w
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00101.html (18,901 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 21:33:56 -0500
When I did those tests at my house the velocity factor of a dipole on the ground was usually about 65% but many times there was no resonance at all, so no way to calculate velocity factor. Total impe
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00103.html (8,920 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: FCP vs Gull Wing Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:00:01 -0400
Hi Jerry, 65% is in the wheelhouse for DOG VF's. 400 to 600 ohms seems high. In the 12 county area around Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, we measured 120 - 200 ohms resonant R. The variation you experien
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00105.html (10,656 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu